Skip to the Site Index
Skip to Page Content
Environment Canada signature Canada Wordmark
Skip first menu
  Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New
About Us
Topics Publications Weather Home
Stratospheric Ozone
Ozone Home
Substances and Sectors
Abstract
Introduction
Regulatory Framework
Application of Halons
Emission Reduction
Decommissioning
Provincial Contacts
Relevant Codes and Standards
ULC Certification Categories and Service Companies
Halon Substitutes Under the U.S. EPA's SNAP Program
Hazard /Risk Analysis
Adobe Acrobat Version

Environmental Code of Practice on Halons

Application of Halons

Halons are used in fire protection because they are effective fire extinguishing agents, are electrically non-conductive, leave no solid or liquid residue, are non-corrosive, and are considered not toxic at recommended concentrations for occupied areas. However, halons significantly contribute to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer.

Halons were never produced in Canada and their importation started around 1965. In Canada, halon 1211 is used almost exclusively in portable equipment (hand-held fire extinguishers and, to a limited extent, in larger capacity wheeled units mainly used at civil and military airports). Halon 1301 is employed primarily in automatic fixed systems (also known as total-flooding systems). These fire protection systems are designed to provide a fire extinguishing concentration of the agent. Applications include: computer rooms, telecommunications facilities, control rooms, shipboard machinery spaces, aircraft engine nacelles and cargo bays, and other similar high value fire risks.

Until recently, actual fire fighting and explosion suppression represented the smallest portion of all halon releases. Other sources of releases include unwanted discharge in response to non-fire situations, equipment leakage, testing, training, and losses during service procedures.

Modifications in work procedures have already resulted in significant reductions in halon emissions. In total-flooding installations, instead of testing for enclosure integrity by discharge testing, door-fan tests and other procedures that do not require the use of halons are currently employed. New training procedures for aircraft personnel using hand held halon fire extinguishers has significantly reduced emissions.

Diligence by the facility owner is required to further reduce emissions caused by unwanted release due to non-fire events.

3.1 Responsibilities

The owner is responsible for protecting a facility against fire damage. Similarly, maintaining an existing fire protection system that uses halons, or searching for alternatives to halon fire protection, rests with the owner of the facility.

3.2 Alternatives to Halons

Alternatives are now available for many of the applications where halons would have been the extinguishant of choice in the past. However, for some applications, satisfactory alternatives are not yet perfected. These include:

  1. applications with space and/or weight restrictions (i.e., aircraft, submarines, military tactical personnel carriers, and so on); and
  2. applications where inerting concentrations of agent must be achieved in occupied areas.

Throughout the world, concerned groups (for example, the aircraft industry, or the military) are financing tremendous research and development efforts to find suitable alternatives to halons.

In the United States, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) periodically updates a list of all acceptable alternatives to halons. Criteria to determine the acceptability of alternatives includes the impact on human health and the environment. The list addresses streaming applications (portables) and the total-flooding systems (in occupied and non-occupied applications). Environment Canada concurs with the U.S. EPA list which is reproduced in Appendix D.

Alternatives can satisfactorily replace halon 1211 in most applications with very few exceptions (such as fire protection on aircraft or submarines). Alternatives to halon 1301 must be tailored to specific needs. Consideration should be given to the particular class of fire hazard when determining alternatives to halons. National Fire Protection Association standard 2001 lists minimum requirements for clean agents to replace halons in total-flooding systems. State-of-the-art detection systems or compartmentation of protected assets may alleviate the need to use halons.

Assistance in determining the most suitable choice of fire protection for a particular fire hazard can be obtained by consulting existing documentation (see Appendix B - Relevant Codes and Standards) or a fire protection professional.

3.3 Recycling Halons

Halons can be removed from applications where:

  • alternatives to halons provide an acceptable protection against fire risks;
  • there have been changes to the relevant asset being protected; or
  • the asset has reached the end of its useful life.

The recovered halons can then be reconditioned and recycled to meet the needs of more critical applications or provide recharge quantities to maintain existing systems.

The Underwriters' Laboratories of Canada has published two standards that specifically address halon recycling: (a) the servicing of halon extinguishing systems and (b) halon recovery and reconditioning equipment (see Appendix B - Relevant Codes and Standards).

ATTENTION:
Some provincial legislations now require that only certified companies can service halon systems. Refer to the appropriate provincial authority for additional information.

This Environmental Code of Practice recommends that equipment containing halons is serviced only by companies certified to ULC standards

3.4 Essential Uses

The Parties to the Montreal Protocol have prohibited the world-wide production of halons since January 1994. Two exceptions to this world-wide production ban are (a) developing countries — called "Article 5 countries" — for their domestic needs, and (b) exemptions for essential uses. Exemptions are granted by the Parties. Parties to the Montreal Protocol are asked each year to submit nominations for essential use exemption 1.

Although producing halons is prohibited around the world, it should be emphasized that the USE of existing halons is NOT prohibited.

The essential use exemption grants a Party the permission to produce (or import) a specified quantity of newly-manufactured halons for the specified use during the specified period. To date, all the nominations submitted to the Parties for an exemption from the production phase-out have been rejected. The rationale for the rejection was not the essential characteristics of the application, but the belief that existing halon stocks are large enough to accommodate, through recycling, the more critical needs of fire protection.

The Russian Federation has been granted an essential use exemption. The exemption is for halon 2402 starting in 1996 and beyond.

3.5 The Halon Bank

Canada has no physical halon bank where users could deposit or withdraw halons. The halon bank is a clearinghouse service administered by the Underwriters' Laboratories of Canada (ULC).

The halon bank (1-416-757-3611) puts clients in touch with appropriate companies - halon owners with halon buyers and vice-versa. The halon bank also provides an up-to-date selection of information relating to the conservation and use of halons.


1. At the beginning of every summer, Environment Canada publishes a notice in the Canada Gazette, Part I, asking users to submit nominations for an essential use exemption.

NEXT >>


| What's New | About Us | Topics | Publications | Weather | Home |
| Help | Search | Canada Site |
The Green LaneTM, Environment Canada's World Wide Web site
Important Notices