Health Canada - Government of Canada
Skip to left navigationSkip over navigation bars to content
About Health Canada

Best Practices and Prospects for Social Marketing in Public Health

Speech by
François Lagarde
Social Marketing and Communications Consultant

At the 89th Annual Conference of the
Canadian Public Health Association on
Best Practices in Public Health
Montreal, Quebec
June 8, 1998

Biography

François Lagarde, M.A., has worked as a social marketing and communications consultant since 1991. From 1984 to 1991, Mr. Lagarde worked for ParticipACTION where he served as vice-president and manager of media campaigns/special projects. He is currently a consultant to several organizations in the health, environment, and development aid fields. Mr. Lagarde's client base is wide-ranging: foundations, community groups, private companies, and public agencies, including several public health organizations, as well as federal and provincial departments of health. In addition, he is currently working with the Academy for Educational Development, a Washington-based organization renowned for its leadership in the development and implementation of social change strategies. Mr. Lagarde is also a trainer and frequent guest speaker at seminars in several Canadian universities and organizations.

Introduction

Every day, public health professionals juggle with new information on the population health status. Citizens, professionals and decision-makers are constantly being encouraged to adopt certain types of behaviour or make decisions which will help create and maintain a health-oriented physical and social environment. Using their knowledge and expertise, public health professionals produce reports and plans, which they follow up with recommendations to a large number of individuals and organizations in the hope that messages will be adopted.

Yet, people who attempt to convince others to change their behaviour or decisions soon realize that conveying objective information on the scope of issues or how to behave will only make a very limited number of people change.

You may even have thought about your relative success in terms of change while watching television one evening. After all, if a car manufacturer, food company or a bank can convince consumers to buy or use their products, why couldn't we use the same methods in public health to convince people to adopt a certain type of behaviour?

This is how the idea of applying commercial marketing methods to social or public health issues originated. The idea first began to take root in the postwar period (Rothschild, 1997). However, the expression "social marketing" was used for the first time in 1971 by Philip Kotler and Gerald Zaltman who defined it as follows: "Social marketing is the design, implementation, and control of programs calculated to influence the acceptability of social ideas and involving considerations of product planning, pricing, communication, distribution, and marketing research."

Over the past few decades, a growing number of organizations have adopted this approach. The number of social marketing definitions began to grow. One definition that I find particularly relevant is: "Social marketing is the application of commercial marketing technologies to the analysis, planning, execution, and evaluation of programs designed to influence the voluntary behavior of target audiences in order to improve their personal welfare and that of their society." (Andreasen, 1995).

Fundamental Components

Over the past few years, academics and practitioners have tried to identify the fundamental components of social marketing (Lefebvre and Rochlin, 1997; Maibach et al., 1997; Middlestadt et al., 1996; Smith, 1998). This following list is a summary:

  1. Developing an audience-centered orientation, rather than one that focuses on the message to be conveyed. This orientation is achieved by holding formative research activities to better understand the audience profile (needs, wants, perceptions, lifestyles, living environment and media habits).
  2. Segmenting the audience or clientele. For example, it would be wrong to say that all adolescents between the ages of 14 and 18 think and behave the same way. Segmentation based on predisposition, motives, values and lifestyle is essential when designing and targeting social marketing activities.
  3. Taking into account real and perceived barriers (which prevent people from adopting a new behaviour) combined with a willingness to modify programs, products, services or ideas accordingly. Of course, this involves acting on the systems or structures which create the barriers.
  4. Illustrating the benefits for individuals in the target group based on their needs and interests, which are not necessarily the same as those of public health professionals and experts.
  5. Using a variety of means to reach target audiences through the media, face-to-face communication and events. The methods selected should be based on an analysis of the target groups' profiles.
  6. Pre-testing, as well as ongoing monitoring and evaluation to modify and improve the program. This includes documenting the impact or outcomes.
  7. Seeking participation by representatives from target groups at the design stage through research and mobilization activities.
  8. Forming partnerships to enhance credibility and facilitate access to target groups. Partnerships also help mobilize the human, financial and material resources required to implement social marketing activities.
  9. Creating synergy and complementarity with all other types of approaches to social change, which may have a sustainable effect on the modification of behaviours and health determinants.
  10. Making a substantial and long-term financial commitment is equally vital to the success of these types of programs. The extent and duration of financial commitments must be in keeping with the level of change expected. You also need to remember that social change does not take months, but rather years or decades.

Best Practices in Canadian Public Health

Since the title of this conference is "Best Practices in Public Health", I thought it would be appropriate to illustrate the ten fundamental components of social marketing using Canadian accomplishments as examples. I would like to take this opportunity to thank leaders in Canadian social marketing who helped me select these examples for you: Peggy Edwards, Larry Hershfield, Jim Mintz, Lise Renaud and Eric Young. I would also add that this list of "best practices" is not the result of exhaustive research, nor does it necessarily represent all initiatives worthy of the list. After all, my objective here is to illustrate the fundamental components of social marketing. I would also like to demonstrate how social marketing can be applied at both the local and national levels.

ParticipACTION

ParticipACTION was established the same year the first definition of social marketing was published. The organization is often hailed as one of the first Canadian success stories in social marketing. For the past quarter century, ParticipACTION has dedicated its efforts toward the promotion of physical activity, and its work is recognized around the world. Peggy Edwards (1997) summarized the reasons for the organization's success: ParticipACTION had a great start with clear and specific objectives. Media good will and high-quality messages have meant that ParticipACTION has never paid a cent for media coverage valued at an estimated $15 million per year. ParticipACTION has also been successful at attracting and involving corporate, not-for-profit and professional partners. Although ParticipACTION is generally associated with traditional advertising campaigns, the organization also explored a number of different avenues. The CrownLife ParticipACTION Challenge, which pitted active cities against each other, was a classic example of a community event that was both the message and the medium. Using a bottom-up, light-hearted approach, ParticipACTION's ongoing delivery is based on a loose motivational model with examples that are easy to follow and adapt based on: awareness, education, motivation, solutions and reinforcement.

Vitality

Vitality is a joint campaign of ParticipACTION and Health Canada. Formative research and an in-depth analysis of the target clientele revealed two key observations: First of all, that time is the major obstacle which prevents people between the ages of 25 and 45 from having a healthy nutrition and engaging in regular physical activity. Secondly, that the primary goal of this particular population segment is to spend time with their friends and children. Vitality launched a campaign based on the slogan: "Grab on to the Good Times." Advertisements showed moments in daily life where adults forgot about their concerns, and spent some time in the company of their children or friends. The "good times" were centered around physical activities and a healthy nutrition.

Health Canada Segmentation and Partnerships

Since the mid-1980s, a highly dynamic team at Health Canada has created some major social marketing campaigns under the leadership of Jim Mintz. All campaigns have been subject to ongoing monitoring (Health and Welfare Canada,1992).

I would say that what makes these campaigns so different is the care with which target audiences are analyzed and the resulting segmentation. The most noteworthy example is definitely the psychographic segmentation of youth between the ages of 11 and 17 for the "Really Me" anti-drug campaign and the "Break Free" campaign urging youth to not start or to quit smoking. Health Canada defined seven population segments based on the behaviour and attitudes of youth to better target and prioritize groups. The advertising agencies which worked for Health Canada were thus able to reach the right audiences.

Over a ten-year period, Health Canada also formed partnerships with more than 125 companies, non-profit organizations and other government agencies. Together, the organizations contributed close to $60 million in financial, human and material resources. This is an impressive feat for a government organization that must balance partners' needs with the political and administrative constraints in a major federal government department.

Health Canada has also published numerous documents, organized training activities and set up Web sites to help Canadian public health professionals acquire social marketing knowledge and know-how. The vast majority of public health professionals who adopted social marketing methods have benefitted and continue to benefit from Health Canada's work.

OK, I Quit!

The "OK, I Quit!" campaign was carried out in the Montreal area, and was a scripto-visual tool to help women stop smoking. The audience was functionally illiterate women between the ages of 18 and 35 with less than nine years of schooling. The campaign was designed, tested and validated through formative research conducted with some forty people in the target population segment and an advisory committee. The project was interesting in that it brought to light significant differences in viewpoints between advisory committee members and women in the target population segment. Fortunately, the team proved extremely willing to modify the project based on the comments of the target population segment. The number of pages in the guide was reduced from 24 to 8, and the initial step-based approach was eliminated. Instead, the guide provided concrete methods to help women quit smoking. The women in the illustrations were also modified to have a more realistic appearance. Lise Renaud, Monique Caron-Bouchard and Gloria Sacks-Silver (1990/1991) concluded their project report with: "We converted the guide into scripto-visual language adapted to the needs and expectations of the target clientele. The formative research proved to be truly useful in this instance. Aside from producing a significant reduction in production costs, the formative research ensured greater effectiveness for the product and better communication with the target audience."

Strengthening the Forces

Strengthening the Forces is a health promotion campaign of the Canadian Forces that focuses essentially on the benefits of health and physical activity to help members of the Forces carry out their work. To respect the organizational culture and internal dynamics of the armed forces, the campaign brought health to the forefront alongside other key military values, such as respect for the chain of command, pride, a sense of mission, team spirit, etc.. In short, members of the forces could not consider themselves accomplished soldiers if they were not concerned with their physical and mental fitness, as well as that of their subordinates. A social marketing strategy was primarily applied to communications between health personnel and each member of the Canadian Forces. The face-to-face approach was further reinforced with notices on bulletin boards and in various publications, as well as speeches during events. Basically, all methods recommended as part of the formative research were used. Motives and obstacles which would prevent members from adopting a wide range of behaviours were also covered. Objectives have been evaluated annually since the campaign was launched. Updating and reminder activities for health personnel are carried out frequently on practically all Canadian Forces bases.

The Fort McMurray Young Adult HIV Prevention Campaign

To increase awareness of HIV risks among young adults, the Fort McMurray (Alberta) Young Adult Prevention Campaign launched an innovative radio program to deliver HIV prevention messages to a hard-to-reach target audience: young males between the ages of 18 and 26 who may be at risk of HIV. A nine-episode radio play called "Riff the Cat" was developed for radio, since it is a medium known to be popular with the target group. The campaign obtained the support of newspapers and public transit commissions, then used posters and the Internet to turn the play into the primary strategy for combatting apathy among young adults toward personal risks from HIV. Campaign organizers spent an enormous amount of time carrying out an exhaustive review of relevant publications (Kneeshaw, 1996). They also ensured that youth from the target group participated in the development of the show's characters (Barrington and Kneeshaw, 1996). This project is an excellent example of partnership at work. The media placement, production and broadcasting of material was contributed free of charge by public and private-sector partners. The activity took place in early 1998, and is part of an ongoing project subject since 1992. All activities are subject to evaluation and organizers are always prepared to modify the program based on current evaluations.

Project on Steroids and Body Image

One of the aims of the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport is to reduce the use of anabolic steroids by young men (ages 14-24) to change their appearance. After consulting publications on the subject and interviewing professionals, gym owners, trainers, police officers and public health professionals, messages were developed and pre-tested to convey straightforward information that would not be ignored. Campaign organizers were also aware that the muscle-building effects of steroids could not be denied. In fact, steroids do have the desired effect in terms of muscle development, and users are generally satisfied with results. Therefore, campaign materials could not simply state the opposite, and deny the efficacy of steroids. Given their motivations, members of the target group were more likely to react to outside or social taboos, such as: peer censure of the activity, the risk of HIV/AIDS, the stigma of drug use; the visible physical and psychological side effects of use, and the black market. The campaign also focused on several audiences which were likely to have an influence on youth. The groundwork helped prepare the design of the material and publication strategies. The following campaign messages illustrate the campaign's overall positioning: Steroids Make You Smaller, If You Pump This... Know This, and Rage Against Roids.

Critics of Social Marketing

In spite of its popularity, social marketing also has its critics.

Social marketing is often accused of placing undue responsibility on individuals to solve public health problems (Maibach and Holtgrave,1995). I would agree that if a program focuses solely on the willingness and ability of individuals to adopt a certain type of behaviour, it places an inordinate amount of responsibility on individuals. Social, political or physical barriers must be taken into account. However, social marketing cannot be criticized for this shortcoming if it is limited exclusively to the influence exercised over individuals. Nothing is stopping public health professionals from using social marketing principles to modify the decisions and actions of socio-economic and political partners. For example, I worked with a team at the Montérégie Public Health Department to develop a social marketing strategy that would encourage elected officials and municipal employees to enforce municipal regulations against smoking. From this standpoint, social marketing can be a major asset for convincing decision-makers and individuals who are in a position to influence overall health determinants to make significant changes.

Social marketing is also accused as being tantamount to public manipulation. The issue of manipulation is essentially an ethical one, which involves every form of communication and social change. I have seen lobbyists play around with numbers and community leaders manipulate causes, meetings and crowds. In social marketing, our primary goal is to establish a link between the motives of the target group and the behaviour being advocated. False representation is obviously just as unacceptable in social marketing as in any other field.

I have also detected a certain fundamental contempt among critics of social marketing for using the commercial marketing methods of the capitalist system - a system that some people hold responsible for our public health and environmental problems. At times, I have also noticed some resistance on the part of public health experts to accept formative research results which contradict some of their own premises.

If you find the word 'marketing' hard to say, then just avoid it. However, be sure that you take the time to know your audiences better before actually addressing them. The very real motives and barriers they encounter are just as important as the public health issues and messages you seek to convey to them. There is lots of room for humility in social marketing too. People respond when you modify your programs based on your knowledge of their reality. Whether you call this method marketing or not, the important thing is to apply it.

Perspectives

A number of authors and conferences have studied the future of social marketing as a field. Social marketing practices could certainly benefit from a more precise definition of the field, increased training for professionals, more sophisticated and better adapted research techniques, more extensive and longer-term financial resources, as well as a systematic evaluation of practices (Maibach et al., 1997; Lefebvre, 1997). Other issues of a different nature, but of equal importance, also come to mind regarding the future of social marketing in public health:

  • Complementarity and synergy with other approaches to change
  • Information technology

Complementarity and Synergy with Other Approaches to Change

I am all for the ecumenical approach to change strategies. Social marketing alone is rarely sufficient to bring about change. A variety of strategies need to be applied if change is to occur. Social marketing works best when policies are modified and communities are mobilized. The combined approach can change conditions, as well as socio-economic and environmental systems. Ultimately, this will have an impact on both individual behaviour and health determinants.

Information Technology

The explosion of new information technology is more than just a passing fad. This is a major turning point in the way we communicate and perceive relations at the community level. Technology is transforming the geographically-based notion of the community to one of a community of interests. Marshall Goldsmith recently summarized this fundamental change when he wrote: "New technologies, new organizational forms, and the rise of the global village will have a profound effect on our sense of community in the years ahead. Two trends stand out: the explosion of our potential to communicate instantaneously and massively across the globe and, closely aligned with that, our ability to create communities of choice." In social marketing, we will have to do more than simply place what we have on paper on the Internet. Leaders of social change will have to adapt to an interactive world where social dynamics are modified by information technology. People who are not open to dialog and willing to accept profound changes to their practices will not succeed.

Conclusion

A number of Canadian experiences illustrate the contribution of social marketing to the advancement of public health issues. Canada has even played a leadership role in this regard. Despite what some critics have said, social marketing provides a rigorous framework for the analysis of needs, motivations and barriers among target audiences. Social marketing will be invaluable in the future if we apply it toward integrated actions and approaches to social change. We should also use it to influence decision-makers who can have an impact on health determinants and the conditions that will facilitate the adoption of specific types of behaviour by the population. Social marketing will then be able to continue to make a contribution to the public health by influencing and mobilizing both decision-makers and the public so they adopt health-oriented behaviours and practices.

References

  • Andreasen, A.R. (1995). Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Barrington, G.V. and Kneeshaw, R. (1996). The HIV/AIDS initiative for young adults: Phase 2, themes. Gail V. Barrington & Associates Inc. for Alberta Health.
  • Edwards, P. (1997). Social marketing savvy: ParticipACTION celebrates its silver anniversary. Health Promotion in Canada, Volume 34, Number 2, 7-9.
  • Goldsmith, M. (1998). Global communications and community of choice. In F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith, R. Beckhard and R.F. Schubert (Eds), The community of the future (pp. 101-114). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Health Canada (1993). Still making a difference: The Impact of the Health Promotion Directorate's social marketing campaign 1992-1993.
  • Kneeshaw, R. (1996). The HIV/AIDS initiative for young adults: Phase 2, literature review. Gail V. Barrington & Associates Inc. for Alberta Health.
  • Kotler, P. & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3-12.
  • Lefebvre, R.C. (1997). 25 years of social marketing: Looking back to the future. Social Marketing Quarterly, Volume III, Number 3 & 4, 51-58.
  • Lefebvre, R.C. and Rochlin, L. (1997). Social marketing. In K. Glanz, F.M. Lewis, and B.K. Rimer (Eds), Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 384-402). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Maibach, E. and Holtgrave, D.R. (1995). Advances in public health communication. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 16, 219-238.
  • Maibach, E., Shenker, A. & Singer, S. (1997). Results of the Delphi survey. Journal of Health Communication, 2, 304-307.
  • Middlestadt, S., Hoffman, C., D'Andrea, E.M. (1996). What intervention studies say about effectiveness: A resource for HIV prevention community planning groups. Washington, D.C.: Academy for Educational Development.
  • Renaud, L., Caron-Bouchard, M. et Sacks-Silver, G. (1990/1). Oui, j'arrête : un instrument scripto-visuel sur l'anti-tabagisme pour les femmes analphabètes fonctionnelles. Hygie (Revue internationale de promotion de la santé et d'éducation pour la santé), Vol. IX, 16-21.
  • Rothschild, M. (1997). An historic perspective of social marketing. Journal of Health Communication, 2, 308-309.
  • Smith, W. (1998). Social marketing: What's the big idea? Social Marketing Quarterly, Vol. IV, Number 2, 5-17.

1. Source: Various documents written by Russ Kisby of ParticipACTION and François Lagarde.

Last Updated: 2005-07-07 Top