Canada Canadian Heritage / Patrimoine canadien Canada
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home
What's New
About CCI
Who We Are
CCI In Action
Virtual Tour
Services
Learning Opportunities
CCI Library
Publications
The Bookstore
Conservation Information Database
CCI Newsletter
CCI Notes
Technical Bulletins
Resources
Preserving my Heritage Web site
BCIN
Links of Interest
Tools
Preservation Framework Online
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Program
Downloads
Feedback
Tell a Colleague about the site
Symposium 2007


eServices eServices
Publications E-Mail This Page Print Version

CCI Newsletter, No. 35, June 2005

Developing a Workshop on Integrated Pest Management for Japanese Collection Managers

by Tom Strang, Senior Conservation Scientist, CCI; and Dr. Rika Kigawa, Senior Researcher, Department of Conservation Science, National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Tokyo (Tobunken)

Pests can present a major risk to heritage collections. Recognizing the strong parallels between Canadian and Japanese pest populations, climatic zones, and cultural desires to reduce the use of environmentally toxic chemicals, as well as similarities in our own research interests, we (the authors) began a professional collaboration in 2001 to promote integrated pest management (IPM) as a safe and effective means of protecting collections.

Methyl bromide (MeBr) has been a widely used fumigant for many years. As a means of pest control it is efficacious, relatively inexpensive, and readily available. However, when the United Nation’s Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer was signed in 1987, MeBr was one of the gases targeted for reduction and eventual cessation of use. Following a schedule of declining allowances, many countries including Japan continued using MeBr through the 1990s. With MeBr phase-out marked for 2005, alternative solutions such as IPM are now urgently required.

We started by arranging a day-long seminar in Tokyo in 2002, where we outlined IPM methodology and showcased example applications. In 2003, we visited six Canadian museums and archives with which CCI has had long-standing associations in surveying or designing solutions to pest problems. By reviewing how IPM had been integrated into these organizations, we were able to establish the goals for a subsequent training program.

In late 2003, we started designing a workshop to foster ‘early adopters’ of IPM who are managing Japanese collections. It was our intention to create a fast-paced, fun, and thoughtful event. Technical hurdles soon arose as we attempted to work on mixed Japanese–English documents across our Windows, Mac, and Linux computing platforms. These problems were overcome in early 2004 when, half a world apart, a WebDAV1 environment networked our laptops so that we could transfer large-content files. Framework documents and the institutional backing of the National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Tokyo (Tobunken) were in place by April 2004, and by June the first 11 participants had registered. By mid-summer, to ensure the pace of content development stayed on track for course presentation in October 2004, I was time-shifting my workday so that the end of my day in Ottawa would overlap the beginning of Dr. Kigawa’s next day in Japan (Tokyo is 13 hours ahead of Ottawa).

The first afternoon of the workshop was spent identifying pests from live specimens and their signs.


A pre-conference survey was sent to all course participants to learn the current state of pest control in their organizations, determine what information they would require in exercises, and gauge their knowledge of IPM. We used the latter to ensure a good balance of experience and perspectives across the five work-groups we created.

One aspect of the course that took considerable design effort was the development of an opening exercise. It had to introduce people to each other, educate them, and be fun. The creation of “Mushimeishi” was a fortuitous intersection of this need, Japanese card cultures, and my sometimes overheated mind. “Mushi” is Japanese for insect. “Meishi” means business card, for which the Japanese are famous. But Japan has another extensive culture in game cards, fractionally known to Western parents through the phenomenon of Pokemon and Yu-Gi-Oh. “Mushimeishi” were therefore cards that contained images of insects along with information on their systematics, material damage, life cycle, and hazard ratings. Each participant received a selection of these information-dense profiles of the top pests with a synopsis of their capabilities, and had to trade with others to obtain a complete set. Booster packs on IPM and control topics rounded out the participants’ decks collected through the following days.

The workshop was eventually presented at Tobunken in Tokyo on October 12–14, 2004; there were 22 participants from Japan and one from Korea.

Morning sessions mixed short lectures and related exercises. These sessions covered introductions to the pests; pest risks to cultural property; pest capabilities and how they can be exploited in IPM; building and storage vulnerabilities; surveying for pests (from comprehensive visual to trap sampling strategies); pest databases; and mapping. Presentations by participants who had experience with applying elements of IPM were also incorporated to broaden the network of expertise available to all participants.

Afternoon sessions were activity based. The first afternoon was spent identifying pests from live specimens and their signs; we were fortunate to have Dr. Katsuji Yamano of the Japan Institute of Insect Damage to Cultural Properties (Bunchuken) to lead this activity. The second afternoon involved working with oxygen absorber, humidified nitrogen generator, and carbon dioxide fumigation systems, as well as low and elevated temperature control methods. These sessions gave participants an opportunity to try alternate control methods and critique them, handle samples that had been treated, and understand the hardware and logistics of systems demonstrated by our industrial partners: the Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, the Ryoko Chemical Company, and the Ekika Carbon Dioxide Company.

The third day was an on-site practicum where the five work-groups were introduced to real pest problems at the National Museum of Japanese History (Rekihaku) in Sakura. They were then despatched with staff members who could facilitate their investigations, and were required to survey, analyse, and design IPM solutions for a given task. Five laptops were provided for the groups to create Powerpoint presentations on their findings and present their proposals to us all. Ideas from this experience have since been integrated into Rekihaku’s operations.

We thank the management and staff of Tobunken, Bunchuken, and Rekihaku, as well as the participants who travelled between typhoons, for their enthusiastic support of this prototype training event.

Although this project was focused on Japanese pest management problems, the new IPM techniques and improved training methods that resulted from this collaboration will have tremendous long-term benefits for Canadian collections.

Doumo arigatou gozaimashita.
  1. WebDAV (Web-based Distributed Authorizing and Versioning) is a protocol that allows users to collectively edit and manage files on remote Web servers.

 

 




Last Updated: 2005-8-15

Important Notices

Home | What’s New | About CCI | Who We Are | CCI In Action | Virtual Tour | Services | Learning Opportunities | CCI Library |
Publications | The Bookstore | Conservation Information Database | CCI Newsletter | CCI Notes | Technical Bulletins | Resources |
Preserving My Heritage Website | BCIN | Links of Interest | Tools | Preservation Framework Online |
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Program | Downloads | Feedback | Tell a Colleague About The Site