![](/web/20071222120539im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/images/rndl.gif) |
Transportation in Canada 2002 |
![](/web/20071222120539im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/images/rndr.gif) |
|
|
![Skip all menus (access key: 2)](/web/20071222120539im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/images/18px.gif) |
7 ROAD TRANSPORTATION
FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION
Heavy truck fleet
The Canadian Vehicle Survey provides information on the heavy
truck fleet and its use characteristics. In 2001, more than 580,000
trucks were registered with a gross vehicle weight of at least
4,500 kilograms. As Table 7-5 shows, this fleet was split between
330,000 medium trucks weighing between 4,500 and 15,000 kilograms
and almost 254,000 Class 8 (heavy) trucks weighing more than 15,000
kilograms. Three quarters of the heavy truck fleet was concentrated
in three provinces: Ontario with 40 per cent, Alberta with 25
per cent, and Quebec with 11.5 per cent. The medium-sized truck
fleet was a little more evenly distributed with five provinces
sharing about 90 per cent of the total. The distribution of vehicle-kilometres
was heavily tilted in favour of heavy trucks with over 18 billion
being performed in 2001, versus less than 6.5 billion for medium
trucks. The distribution of heavy truck vehicle-kilometres was
even more concentrated in Ontario, Alberta, and Quebec with these
three provinces controlling 80 per cent of the kilometres driven.
TABLE 7-5: CANADA’S HEAVY TRUCK FLEET, 2001
|
Vehicles (Thousands) |
Vehicle-kilometres (Millions) |
Percentage distribution |
Vehicles |
Vehicle-kilometres |
Medium |
Heavy |
Medium |
Heavy |
Medium |
Heavy |
Medium |
Heavy |
Newfoundland and Labrador |
3.6 |
2.5 |
121 |
164 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.9 |
0.9 |
Prince Edward Island |
1.7 |
2.3 |
20 |
47 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Nova Scotia |
7.9 |
7.0 |
162 |
546 |
2.4 |
2.7 |
2.5 |
2.9 |
New Brunswick |
7.7 |
3.8 |
173 |
128 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
2.7 |
0.7 |
Quebec |
49.0 |
29.2 |
1,042 |
3,120 |
14.8 |
11.5 |
16.1 |
16.8 |
Ontario |
72.2 |
97.8 |
1,916 |
8,202 |
21.9 |
38.6 |
29.6 |
44.2 |
Manitoba |
8.6 |
11.8 |
201 |
1,332 |
2.6 |
4.7 |
3.1 |
7.2 |
Saskatchewan |
43.8 |
21.6 |
478 |
987 |
13.3 |
8.5 |
7.4 |
5.3 |
Alberta |
82.0 |
62.8 |
1,403 |
3,518 |
24.8 |
24.8 |
21.7 |
18.9 |
British Columbia |
52.2 |
12.9 |
942 |
388 |
15.8 |
5.1 |
14.6 |
2.1 |
Yukon |
0.8 |
0.7 |
9 |
61 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
Northwest Territories |
0.6 |
1.0 |
9 |
85 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
Nunavut |
0.2 |
0.1 |
1 |
- |
0.08 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
Canada |
330.0 |
253.6 |
6,476 |
18,577 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: Canadian Vehicle Survey, Statistics Canada and Transport Canada calculations
In 2001, there was a wide variation in the average kilometres
driven between medium and heavy trucks: on average, medium trucks
were driven 20,000 kilometres, while heavy trucks were driven
almost 75,000 kilometres. By province, the variation in the average
kilometres heavy trucks were driven was huge, ranging from a low
of 20,000 kilometres per vehicle in Prince Edward Island to more
than 100,000 kilometres per vehicle in both Quebec and Manitoba.
By contrast, medium truck use across the provinces clustered fairly
closely around the national average.
Configuration
Table 7-6 breaks down truck vehicle-kilometres driven by type
of vehicle configuration. Medium trucks were characterized by
the straight truck configuration, as more than 80 per cent of
the kilometres driven used this format. Heavy trucks, by contrast,
were dominated by various tractor-trailer combinations; the most
popular was a tractor and one trailer (the conventional 18 wheeler),
which accounted for almost 65 per cent of the heavy truck vehicle-kilometres.
Straight trucks performed only 15 per cent of the heavy truck
vehicle-kilometres.
TABLE 7-6: VEHICLE-KILOMETRES DRIVEN BY TYPE OF VEHICLE CONFIGURATION, 2001
|
Medium (Per cent) |
Heavy (Per cent) |
Straight truck |
80.9 |
14.4 |
Tractor only |
0.1 |
6.6 |
Tractor and 1 trailer |
2.7 |
63.9 |
Tractor and 2 trailers |
0.0 |
11.9 |
Tractor and 3 trailers |
0.0 |
0.4 |
Other |
16.3 |
2.8 |
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: Canadian Vehicle Survey, Statistics Canada and Transport Canada calculations
Table 7-7 shows the purpose that medium and heavy trucks were
typically used for. Medium trucks were put to a mix of uses: carrying
goods or equipment, a traditional freight-hauling role, accounted
for about 50 per cent of the vehicle-kilometres, but non-freight
carrying functions such as making service calls accounted for
more than 40 per cent of the vehicle-kilometres. These latter
functions illustrate that medium-sized trucks were not confined
solely to the for-hire or private trucking business. Of the 6.5
billion vehicle-kilometres driven, about eight per cent were made
empty.
TABLE 7-7: TYPICAL USE OF CANADA’S MEDIUM AND HEAVY TRUCKS, 2001
|
Medium trucks |
Heavy trucks |
|
Vehicle-km (Thousands) |
Share (Per cent) |
Vehicle-km (Thousands) |
Share (Per cent) |
Carrying goods/equipment |
3,150 |
49 |
13,574 |
74 |
Empty |
512 |
8 |
3,246 |
18 |
Other |
2,793 |
43 |
1,612 |
9 |
Total |
6,456 |
100 |
18,431 |
100 |
Source: Canadian Vehicle Survey, Statistics Canada and Transport Canada calculations
The same cannot be said about the heavy truck fleet. Its use
was dominated by the conventional goods-hauling role, with nearly
75 per cent of the vehicle-kilometres reported as being from carrying
goods or equipment. Less than 10 per cent were for other work
purposes and about 18 per cent of vehicle-kilometres were made
empty.
Truck Traffic by Sector
After a slowdown due to the 1990/91 recession, growth in for-hire
trucking2 traffic jumped from 70.6 to 170.9 billion
tonne-kilometres from 1991 to 2001. The transborder sector dominated,
with an average growth rate close to 14 per cent, more than twice
the rate for domestic trucking activities, which was 6.3 per cent.
The latter is a blend of intraprovincial and interprovincial activities,
which grew at five per cent and almost seven per cent per year,
respectively.
In terms of value, almost 65 per cent of Canada-U.S. trade
moved by truck in 2001. Commodities shipped by truck from/to the
United States amounted to $363 billion, driven by exports at $192
billion. Preliminary 2002 trade data show an increase of 2.3 per
cent in the value of cargo carried by truck from/to the United
States. A contributing factor to the strong transborder growth
rate was a significant increase in the average distance travelled.
In the last 15 years (1987 - 2001), the average distance travelled
per trip by Canadian-domiciled trucks to and from the United States
rose from 800 to 1,100 kilometres.
Figure 7-3 illustrates the growth of Canadian for-hire trucking
traffic between 1987 and 2001. Table A7-8 in the Addendum provides
the data in a tabular form.
FIGURE 7-3: TOTAL FOR-HIRE TRUCKING TRAFFIC IN ANNUAL TONNE-KILOMETRES, 1987 – 2001
![Chart of total for-hire trucking traffic in annual tonne-kilometres, 1987 to 2001](/web/20071222120539im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/pol/en/report/anre2002/images/7-3e.gif)
Note: For-hire trucking carriers with annual operating revenues of $0.5 million or more (1988/89), and of $1 million or more (1990 – 2001).
Source: Statistics Canada, Trucking in Canada, Cat. 53-222 and special tabulations
Commodities and trucking flows
In 2001, domestic and transborder for-hire trucking traffic
by Canadian firms generated revenues of $7.9 billion and $6.9
billion, respectively. Five groups of commodities represented
close to 75 per cent of transport revenues: manufactured products,
food products, forest products, metal and steel products, and
automobile/transport products. In terms of volume (tonne-kilometres),
the same five commodities also dominated in the same proportion
(i.e. 75 per cent of the total).
Ontario dominated trucking traffic in all market segments,
with 38 per cent of intraprovincial trucking traffic, 34 per cent
of interprovincial trucking traffic and 44 per cent of total transborder
traffic hauled by trucks. The heaviest traffic flows involved
those between Ontario and the U.S. central region (17.1 billion
tonne-kilometres) and Ontario and the U.S. southern region (10.5
billion tonne-kilometres). For additional information on volume
and trucking flows, please see tables A7-9 to A7-11 in the Addendum.
Canada-U.S. Border Crossing Activity
Heavy truck activity across the Canada-U.S. border rebounded
slightly in 2002, growing two per cent from the 2001 level to
reach 13.3 million two-way trips. Although a reversal of last
year's decline, cross-border heavy truck activity was still off
the 2000 peak of 13.6 million trips. This levelling off of activity
can be attributed to the economic slowdown in the United States
reducing demand for transportation. Car crossings were off nearly
six per cent from last year to 64.2 million trips, the lowest
level since 1987. For further details on border activity by border
crossing, see tables A7-12 and A7-13 in the Addendum.
2 Including Canadian domiciled long-distance for-hire trucking firms with annual operating revenues of $1 million or more. Back to text
Major Events in 2002
Infrastructure
Industry Structure
Passenger Transportation
Freight Transportation
Price, Productivity and Financial Performance
|