7 ROAD TRANSPORTATION
FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION
HEAVY TRUCK FLEET
The Canadian Vehicle Survey also provides information on the heavy
truck fleet and its use characteristics (see Table 7-6). In 2002, more
than 580,000 trucks were registered with a gross vehicle weight of at
least 4,500 kilograms. This fleet was split between 315,000 medium trucks,
weighing between 4,500 kilograms and 15,000 kilograms, and 268,000 heavy
or Class 8 trucks, weighing more than 15,000 kilograms. Three quarters
of the Class 8 heavy truck fleet were concentrated in only three provinces
(Ontario with 38 per cent, Alberta with 24 per cent and Quebec with 13
per cent), while about 90 per cent of the medium truck fleet was concentrated
in five provinces (Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, Quebec and Saskatchewan).
The distribution of vehicle-kilometres tilted heavily in favour of heavy
trucks, at more than 18 billion in 2002 versus fewer than 5.5 billion
for medium trucks. The distribution of heavy truck vehicle-kilometres
was even more concentrated, as Ontario, Alberta and Quebec combined to
account for more than 80 per cent of the kilometres driven.
Given similar numbers of trucks and a huge difference in vehicle-kilometres,
it was no surprise that average distance driven per truck in 2002 was
much greater for heavy trucks than for medium trucks. On average, heavy
trucks were driven nearly 68,000 kilometres per year, almost four times
more than the 17,000 kilometres that medium trucks were driven. By province,
the variation in average distance driven by heavy trucks was also substantial,
ranging from a low of 12,000 kilometres per vehicle in Prince Edward
Island to more than 100,000 per vehicle in Quebec. Medium truck use across
jurisdiction also showed a wide variation, from a low of only 4,000 kilometres
in Saskatchewan to more than 23,000 in Quebec and Ontario.
HEAVY TRUCK VEHICLE CONFIGURATION
Table 7-7 provides a different perspective on the medium/heavy truck
fleet based on truck configuration. The majority of trucks were classified
as straight trucks (i.e. the power unit and the cargo area are combined
in a single chassis), with 300,000 registered in the ten provinces. About
170,000 trucks were classified as tractor-trailers (i.e. the power unit
pulls the cargo area in a separate trailer). The balance, about 110,000
vehicles, were classified as buses and other vehicles. While tractor-trailer
combinations accounted for just 30 per cent of the fleet, they accounted
for two thirds of the truck vehicle-kilometres, or 15.5 billion. Once
again, this pattern was owing to the massive difference in average distance
driven per vehicle. Straight trucks were driven fewer than 20,000 kilometres
per year, while tractor- trailers were driven more than 90,000 kilometres
per year.
TABLE 7-7: HEAVY TRUCK STATISTICS, BY CONFIGURATION, 2002
|
Vehicles |
Vehicle-km |
Fuel (litres) |
Average distance driven (Thousands of kilometres) |
Fuel efficiency (Litres/100km) |
|
(Thousands) |
Share |
(Billions) |
Share |
(Billions) |
Share |
Straight truck |
300 |
51.7 |
5.8 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
22.7 |
19.5 |
33.7 |
Tractor trailer |
170 |
29.4 |
15.5 |
66.3 |
6.2 |
71.8 |
91.2 |
40.2 |
Bus/other |
110 |
18.9 |
2.0 |
8.7 |
0.5 |
5.5 |
18.5 |
23.7 |
Heavy trucks |
580 |
100.0 |
23.4 |
100.0 |
8.7 |
100.0 |
40.4 |
37.1 |
Note: Figures exclude the Territories. Some totals may not add up due to rounding. Data refer to all trucks with a gross vehicle weight of at least 4,500 kg.
Source: Canadian Vehicle Survey 2002 and Transport Canada calculations
Table 7-8 provides further detail on heavy truck vehicle configurations.
Medium trucks were characterized by the straight truck configuration,
with about 80 per cent of the kilometres driven using this format. Heavy
trucks were dominated by various tractor-trailer combinations, with the
most popular being a tractor and one trailer (the conventional 18 wheeler),
which accounted for nearly 70 per cent of the heavy truck vehicle-kilometres.
Straight trucks performed just under 18 per cent of the heavy truck vehicle-kilometres.
TABLE 7-8: VEHICLE-KILOMETRES DRIVEN BY TYPE OF VEHICLE CONFIGURATION, 2002
|
Medium (Per cent) |
Heavy (Per cent) |
Straight truck |
79.9 |
17.6 |
Tractor only |
1.2 |
3.6 |
Tractor and 1 trailer |
2.3 |
68.9 |
Tractor and 2 trailers |
- |
8.2 |
Tractor and 3 trailers |
- |
0.6 |
Other |
16.6 |
1.2 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
Note: Figures exclude the Territories. Some totals may not add up due to rounding. Data refer to all trucks with a gross vehicle weight of at least 4,500 kg.
Source: Canadian Vehicle Survey 2002 and Transport Canada calculations
Medium trucks were put to various uses, with 57 per cent of the vehicle-kilometres
taken up with carrying goods or equipment, a traditional freight-hauling
role, while 35 per cent was devoted to non-freight carrying functions
such as making service calls. These latter functions illustrate that
medium-sized trucks were not confined solely to the for- hire or private
trucking business. Of the 5.4 billion vehicle- kilometres driven by medium
trucks, about eight per cent were done empty.
Heavy truck activity was dominated by the conventional goods-hauling
role, as nearly 80 per cent of the vehicle- kilometres was devoted to
carrying goods or equipment. About five per cent was for other work purposes,
while about 16 per cent of vehicle-kilometres was made empty.
Table 7-9 shows the typical uses of Canada's medium and heavy trucks
in 2002.
TABLE 7-9: TYPICAL USE OF CANADA'S MEDIUM AND HEAVY TRUCKS, 2002
|
Medium trucks |
Heavy trucks |
|
Vehicle-km (Billions) |
Share (Per cent) |
Vehicle-km (Billions) |
Share (Per cent) |
Carrying goods/equipment |
3.1 |
57 |
14.2 |
79 |
Empty |
0.4 |
8 |
2.9 |
16 |
Other work purpose |
1.9 |
35 |
0.9 |
5 |
Total |
5.4 |
100 |
18.0 |
100 |
Note: Figures exclude the Territories. Some totals may not add up due to rounding.
Data refer to all trucks with a gross vehicle weight of at least 4,500 kg.
Source: Canadian Vehicle Survey 2002 and Transport Canada calculations
TRUCK TRAFFIC BY SECTOR
After a slowdown due to the 1990/91 recession, for-hire truck 6 traffic
jumped from 72.9 to 177.2 billion tonne- kilometres over the 1992 - 2002
period. The transborder sector dominated, with an annual average growth
rate of 13.6 per cent. This was more than twice the rate in domestic
trucking activities, which was 6.2 per cent. Domestic trucking activities
include intraprovincial and interprovincial activities, which grew at
rates of five and nearly seven per cent a year, respectively.
In terms of value, about 66 per cent of Canada-U.S. trade moved by
truck in 2002. Commodities shipped by truck from/to the United States
totalled $372 billion, with exports accounting for $197 billion of this.
Preliminary 2003 trade data (11 months) show a decrease of 10 per cent
in the value of cargo carried by truck from/to the United States. A contributing
factor to the decreasing growth in transborder traffic in 2003 was a
sluggish U.S. economy for most of 2003 combined with an appreciation
of the Canadian dollar, which has made Canadian goods relatively more
expensive to American consumers.
Figure 7-4 illustrates the growth of Canadian for-hire trucking traffic
between 1988 and 2002. Table A7-8 in the Addendum provides the data in
a tabular form.
FIGURE 7-4: TOTAL FOR-HIRE TRUCKING TRAFFIC IN ANNUAL TONNE-KILOMETRES,
1988 - 2002
![](/web/20071227002235im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/pol/en/Report/anre2003/images/7-4e.gif)
Note: For-hire trucking carriers with annual operating revenues of $0.5 million or more (1988/89)
and of $1 million or more (1990 - 2002).
Source: Statistics Canada, Trucking in Canada, Cat. 53-222 and Special
tabulations COMMODITIES AND TRUCKING FLOWS
In 2002, domestic and transborder for-hire trucking traffic by Canadian
firms generated revenues of $8.3 billion and $7.3 billion, respectively.
About 81 per cent of transport revenues were attributable to six groups
of commodities: manufactured products (25 per cent), food products (17
per cent), forest products (13 per cent), metal and steel products (10
per cent), automobile and transport products (eight per cent) and plastic/chemical
products (eight per cent). In terms of volume, measured in tonne-kilometres,
the same six commodities also dominated in the same proportion (i.e.
81 per cent of the total).
Ontario dominated in all market segments, with 36 per cent of intraprovincial
trucking traffic, 33 per cent of interprovincial trucking traffic and
44 per cent of total transborder traffic hauled by trucks. At the interprovincial
level, the largest movements were between Ontario and Quebec (12.4 billion
tonne-kilometres), representing almost 24 per cent of total interprovincial
trade by for-hire trucks in volume. At the transborder level, the heaviest
traffic flows involved those between Ontario and the U.S. central region
(18.4 billion tonne-kilometres) and between Ontario and the U.S. southern
region (11.4 billion tonne- kilometres). For additional information on
volume and trucking flows, see tables A7-9 to A7-11 in the Addendum.
CANADA-U.S. BORDER CROSSING ACTIVITY
Heavy truck activity across the Canada-U.S. border shrank two per cent
in 2003, falling back to the 2001 level of 13 million two-way trips.
This is the third straight year of steady or no growth in crossing activity
since the peak of 13.6 million trips in 2000. The levelling off of activity
reflects continuing weakness in the U.S. economy, which reduces the demand
for freight transportation. At 60.1 million trips, car crossings were
off another six per cent from 2002, the lowest level since 1986. For
further details on border activity by border crossing, see the Transport
Canada Annual Report homepage at www.tc.gc.ca.
See Addendum tables A7-12 and A7-13.
6 Including Canadian domiciled long-distance for-hire trucking firms with annual operating revenues of $1 million or more. Back to text
Major Events in 2003
Infrastructure
Passenger Transportation
Freight Transportation
Price, Productivity, Financial Performance
|