Canadian Flag Transport Canada / Transports Canada Government of Canada
Common menu bar (access key: M)
Skip to specific page links (access key: 1)
Policy Group
Policy Overview
Transportation in Canada Annual Reports

Table of Contents
Report Highlights
Addendum
1. Introduction
2. Transportation and the Canadian Economy
3. Government Spending on Transportation
4. Transportation and Safety
5. Transportation - Energy & Environment
6. Transportation and Regional Economies
7. Transportation and Employment
8. Transportation and Trade
9. Transportation and Tourism
10. Transportation Infrastructure
11. Structure of the Transportation Industry
12. Freight Transportation
13. Passenger Transportation
14. Price, Productivity and Financial Performance in the Transportation Sector
Minister of Transport
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Annexes
 
Skip all menus (access key: 2)


10

TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE

Rail Transportation Infrastructure

As shown in Table 10-1, the Canadian rail network changed relatively little in aggregate with a reduction of 0.1 per cent in terms of route-kilometres in 2000. Despite this relatively small amount of change in terms of the entire system, ownership again underwent considerable change, with both CN and CPR experiencing reductions in the size of their networks. Most of this rationalization activity on the part of CN and CPR, however, was accomplished by the transfer of operations and track to other rail carriers, thus continuing recent trends in the distribution of track ownership and the nature of rail operations.

CN and CPR now account for less than two-thirds of the Canadian rail network,Note 1 while regional and shortline railways now account for almost a third of the entire network.

Figure 10-1 shows the result of rail restructuring on route-kilometres between 1990 and 2000.

Rationalization

Railway rationalization, a term that describes the ways that a railway can deal with track that is no longer economically attractive, encompasses both the discontinuance of operations and the transfer of operations to other rail operators. The driving force behind rationalization has been the need to reduce a railway's costs and the costs of the services offered. Transfers of lines to other carriers have several advantages: the lines remain in operation, shippers often receive improved service, and the traffic continues to flow to the Class I carrier, thus continuing to generate revenues.

Figure 10-2 illustrates the CN and CPR rationalization activity that occurred in the rail network in 2000.

Lines transferred to other, smaller rail operators are known as shortline railways. On several occasions, CN and CPR have formed what are known as "internal shortlines," that share many of the characteristics of lines transferred to other operators. While the objectives are the same as with transfers to other operators, internal shortlines usually involve special agreements with labour to facilitate their development.

Railways must provide notice of their intentions by filing plans for their proposed network rationalization for the forthcoming three-year period. In addition, a process provided for under the Act requires that lines proposed for discontinuance be offered for sale to other potential operators or, failing any expression of interest, to other levels of government. Only after all such avenues have been exhausted, are lines permitted to discontinue service.

Of the roughly 1,100 kilometres of line rationalized in 2000, 79 per cent was transferred to other operators. The balance, approximately 225 kilometres of line, was discontinued in 2000, representing a continuation of the declining annual trend in discontinuances that has prevailed since 1996. In a reversal of past patterns, CPR showed a greater amount of rationalization activity than CN during 2000. CN, however, had about 90 per cent of the discontinuances during the year, while CPR had about 70 per cent of the transfers.

Table 10-3 shows rationalization activity by province, in 2000.

Regionally, about 70 per cent of discontinuances occurred in Alberta, while about 63 per cent of line transfers to other operators occurred in Saskatchewan. Over 85 per cent of rationalization activity during 2000 occurred in western Canada. About 75 kilometres (almost 50 per cent) of the discontinued lines in Alberta during 2000 had previously been transferred to RaiLink Mackenzie Northern (RailAmerica) and Alberta RailNet Inc. in 1998 and 1999, respectively. Unfortunately, the discontinued lines had insufficient traffic to be economically viable. Another track segment in northern Alberta was transferred by RaiLink Lakeland & Waterways (RailAmerica) to Athabasca Northern Railway. This line had been transferred from CN two years ago.Note 2

In another development, several lines in the eastern townships of Quebec were purchased by Express Marco from CPR - six years after they had been discontinued. Data for prior years were not adjusted in this case and the trackage involved (425 kilometres) was not included in Table 10-3, although it was reflected in Table 10-2 under CPR discontinuances in Quebec since the discontinuances involved occurred during the 1990's. Figure 10-2 illustrates the distribution of rationalization activity during 2000, as well as the names of the new carriers to which the track was transferred.

As shown in Table 10-2, since 1990, about 18,800 kilometres of track have been either transferred or discontinued by CN and CPR. About 11,500 kilometres, or 55 per cent of the trackage was transferred to other carriers and the balance discontinued. CN accounted for about 70 per cent of the transfers during this period, while discontinuances were more or less evenly distributed between the two carriers. Ontario experienced the greatest amount of rail line discontinuance (22 per cent) since 1990, followed by Saskatchewan (20 per cent). Over 22 per cent of the track transferred since 1990 occurred in Alberta, with approximately 17 per cent each in Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec.

Three-Year Plans

Canadian railways falling under federal government jurisdiction must file plans of their rationalization intentions for the forthcoming three-year period. These plans are usually updated on a frequent basis. The most current CN and CPR plans are dated November 20, 2000, and September 26, 2000, respectively.

As shown in Table 10-4, CN and CPR propose to discontinue approximately 920 kilometres of track in the balance of their current three-year plans. About 25 per cent of proposed discontinuances are in Alberta and Saskatchewan, while 40 per cent are in Ontario. Approximately 940 kilometres of track are proposed for transfer, with about 43 per cent slated to occur in Saskatchewan and 40 per cent in Ontario.

Since provincially regulated railways are not required to file similar rationalization plans, little is known of the intentions of these carriers, although past practices would suggest that very little of the system owned or operated by provincially regulated carriers will be discontinued.

 

TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE

Rail Transportation Infrastructure

Road Transportation Infrastructure

Marine Transportation Infrastructure

Air Transportation Infrastructure

Appendix 10-1 Airports Capital Assistance Program - Projects Approved in 2000

 

CHAPTER 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 11

LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF ANNEXES

NOTES:

1 In terms of route-kilometres.

2 Data for prior years were revised to avoid double-counting.


Last updated: Top of Page Important Notices