![]() | ![]() |
|
![]() Proactive disclosure Print version ![]() ![]() | ![]() | ![]() Radiation Geophysics Radon
Radon (Rn222) is a colourless, odourless radioactive gas that occurs naturally in our environment. It is a product of the natural radioactive decay of uranium (U238) found as a trace element in most rocks, soil and water. Health Canada's fact page on radon provides a health-oriented perspective of radon gas. For radon gas in the home, Health Canada considers 800 Bq/m3 to be the limit above which remedial action is recommended. In the US, the E.P.A. specifies an upper limit of 150 Bq/m3. Radon risk evaluation includes consideration of the following issues:
Health Canada & CMHC publishes
Radon: A guide for Canadian homeowners that
describes the health effects of radon, how to detect it and ways
to reduce exposure to radon in the home.
Airborne gamma-ray spectrometry can be used to evaluate the first factor (source - material capable of producing radon), by identifying uranium-bearing materials at the earth's surface, which may generate radon. The technique provides a positive test, whereby high U values may indicate an increased risk of overexposure to radon. Rocks and soils, such as certain types of clays, with low to moderate U values may still produce high residential radon if factors controlling the transport or collection of radon are dominant (Grasty, 1994). The airborne data is best applied to groups of homes, or areas, rather than to individual sites. Although home-specific information is not provided by an airborne survey, it offers relatively inexpensive, systematic, and fast determination of radon source potential over a large area, even where no development has occurred. Since 1967, through its National Gamma-Ray Spectrometry Program (NATGAM), the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) has been mapping natural and anthropogenic radioactivity, using aerial and field-portable gamma-ray spectrometers. Data from this program accurately depict variations in concentrations of potassium, uranium, thorium and other radioactive elements in the ground, as an aid to geological mapping, mineral exploration, environmental radiation monitoring and land-use planning. Studies in Canada (Letourneau et al. 1984; Cocksedge et al. 1993; Jackson 1992; Doyle et al. 1990), the United States (Otton et al. 1995), Sweden (Akerblom 1995) and Great Britain (Ball et al. 1995) have shown that the ground concentration of uranium determined using an airborne gamma-ray spectrometer provides a qualitative, first-order approximation of regional variation in indoor radon levels and can be used to identify and outline high risk areas. While radon measurements in individual homes is the most direct method
to determine the risk of overexposure to radon there is little predictive
ability especially for areas where there is no development. Through
quantitative determination of radioactive elements in geological materials
at the earth's surface, airborne gamma-ray spectrometry in conjunction
with other geoscientific information, offers an efficient technique for
detection and delineation of high radon risk potential over large areas.
In exceptional cases, such as Oka, Quebec, where airborne eU and in-home
radon values show a strong association, the method provides a direct
indication of radon risk and could be used as a stand-alone technique.
Several studies of radon have been undertaken in Canada, at the national, regional and local scale. Native communitiesIn Canada, airborne gamma-ray spectrometry data from the GSC's NATGAM archives have been used to evaluate risk of overexposure to radon at national, regional and local scales. Cocksedge et al (1993) reported results of a Canada-wide study conducted for Health and Welfare Canada, to assess the potential risks from radon in native homes. To test the usefulness of regional geoscience data, the Geological Survey of Canada used airborne gamma-ray spectrometry, bedrock and surficial geology and geochemistry to evaluate radon potential. This resulted in the selection of 41 native communities that were likely to have high radon potential and 16 communities with low potential. Subsequent testing revealed that no homes in communities with low radon potential exceeded 400 Bq/m3 (half the Canadian guideline of 800 Bq/m3) whereas 42 out of 740 homes (5.6%) in high potential communities exceeded this level. Follow-up was initiated to measure all homes in communities where the probability of finding a home with radon levels above 800 Bq/m3 was estimated to be more than one percent. Nova ScotiaIn the Province of Nova Scotia, Jackson (1992) demonstrated good correlation between the percentage of homes in selected communities with average radon concentrations above 74, 148 and 370 Bq/m3 (2, 4 and 10 pCi/L) and corresponding average equivalent uranium (eU) concentrations determined by airborne gamma-ray spectrometry. Jackson concluded that the airborne gamma-ray spectrometry data would be of value to both government agencies and land developers. QuebecDoyle et al. (1990) selected two communities in Quebec (Ste. Agathe and Maniwaki) with different eU characteristics measured by airborne gamma-ray spectrometry for comparison of their indoor radon concentrations. They concluded that indoor radon variations essentially paralleled the eU patterns such that the lowest mean radon concentrations were associated with the lowest mean eU values, and highest mean radon concentrations were associated with the highest mean eU values. Oka, QuebecIn 1995-96 the Direction régionale de la santé publique des Laurentides (DRSP) conducted a radon measurement program near Oka, Quebec. The DRSP used previously known radon distributions and geological information to define three zones of decreasing risk based on proximity to the known extent of a carbonatite intrusion. Results showed that a higher than expected proportion of houses exceeded 800 Bq/m3 but failed to adequately define the boundaries of all the areas at risk. In 1996 the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) and the DRSP supported a detailed, 200m line spaced airborne gamma-ray spectrometry survey to further assess the risk of overexposure to residential radon and to accurately define the geographic extent of high-risk areas. An analysis of the airborne gamma-ray spectrometry data and the radon measurements revealed some exceptional associations between increasing eU concentrations and the percentage of homes with increasing radon concentrations.
The clear association between high eU concentrations and high radon in homes supported a number of land-use and public health initiatives. These included a recommendation by public health officials that the municipality apply, in its construction by-laws, the Canadian Building Code's Addendum regarding radon gas for its territory, and withhold building permits for certain particularly affected areas. Health authorities offered free radon sampling to homeowners in the affected areas not covered in the initial testing. St-André-d'Argenteuil, QuebecA subsequent study was initiated over a similar alkaline intrusion in the
St-André-d'Argenteuil area 20km west of Oka, where a second airborne
gamma-ray spectrometry survey was also completed. A program to test well
waters for the presence of uranium in Oka and St-André-d'Argenteuil was
also initiated. Given the fact that the situation in Oka was extraordinary
and unique, a program of financial assistance from the Quebec government
was recently approved to help homeowners in the affected areas to apply
mitigation techniques to their homes. This program includes additional
radon measurements, after the application of mitigation techniques, to
confirm their effectiveness.
Akerblom, G. 1995. Ball, T.K., Cameron, D.G., Colman, T.B. and Roberts, P.D. 1995. Cocksedge, W., Rankin, W., Tostowaryk, K., Charbonneau, B.W. and Grasty, R.L. 1993. Doyle, P.J., Grasty, R.L. and Charbonneau, B.W. 1990. Ford, K.L., Savard, M., Dessau, J.-C. and Pellerin, E., 2001. Geological Survey of Canada, 1996. Gold, D.F., Vallée, M. and Charette, P. 1967. Grasty, R.L. 1994. Jackson, S.A. 1992. Letourneau, E.G., McGregor, R.G and Walker, W.B. 1984. Otton, J.K., Gundersen, L.C.S., Schumann, R.R., Reimer, G.M. and Duval, J.S. 1995. Savard, M., Dessau, J.-C., Pellerin, E. 1998.
|