The Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision
Making
Level 4 Technique:
Constituent Assembly
What Is It?
Constituent assemblies are extra-parliamentary bodies convened
to address major constitutional issues or reforms. This process
allows citizens to feel as if they had a say in decision making
around political reform. Constituent assemblies are increasingly
being applied to a wide array of governance issues, both locally
and nationally. Bringing together ordinary citizens and elected
officials in a public and open process is key. Also, this process
works best when it addresses a single compact issue, although suggested
recommendations around reforms may be multifaceted.
How It Works
The constituent assembly consists of a number of citizen delegates
and elected or appointed officials for a fixed term. Information
on the main issues is usually provided at the conference and sessions
should be facilitated by impartial experts on the topic (i.e. constitutional
representatives).
A second form of the assembly (Community Working Group) can be
applied at a regional level, consisting of citizen volunteers who
undertake the job of researching and offering recommendations to
a governing body. In this case, citizen volunteers offer advice
to the regional council (elected officials) based on their findings.
This type of assembly requires support from the elected body in
order to carry out the mandate and is often initiated by government
officials in order to have an external body enact necessary reforms.
When Is It Most Useful?
- when addressing single-issue-oriented topics, such as a constitutional
debate
- getting citizens and elected officials together to discuss
views on a particular topic
- circumstances where it is useful to educate with the intent
of facilitating a meaningful discussion, particularly on governance
issues
- when trying to build consensus on a controversial issue, such
as making changes to the constitution or initiating government
reforms.
Logistics and Limits
The constituent assembly is a formula to be used primarily on
a national level, rather than for regional or local uses. However,
it can be successfully adapted to regional politics, as in the
case of the municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth. Although the infrastructure
can be initiated by a government body, the assembly needs to "take
a life of its own" and be seen as independent from governing structures.
Also, the process needs to be very public and open in order to
generate public interest and support for the decisions.
Cost Implications
Initial start-up can be both timely and costly, but definitely
worthwhile once the infrastructure is put into place.
Expectation for Feedback or Follow-Up
The assembly has to make every effort to encourage the community
to participate fully and meaningfully by using a wide range of
consultative methods. There is an expectation that all the research
and recommendations should be published for public and government
use. There is also a need for citizens to feel as if their participation
counted for something; therefore, consultations may have to be
ongoing.
Timelines
This is usually an ongoing process that could take upward of a
year as a full-fledge commitment for public involvement. The actual
assembly could be one week, or a series of smaller meetings between
participants.
Potential Pitfalls
The assembly can be a labour-intensive process and, because of
the amount of time required, may not generate the interest or resources
necessary to maintain it. Also, if it does not gain support either
by the public (seen as "top-down") or the elected officials (seen
as releasing too much power), the assembly will not work. Furthermore,
this particular process is not right for addressing issues that
are very controversial or broad.
|