2006-02-20
- #: 8665-C12-200601626 - Avis public 2006-4
- Instance visant à établir le cadre de la liste nationale
de numéros de téléphone exclus et à examiner
les règles de télémarketing
Calendrier - Avis Public 2006-4
Activités |
Dates
limites |
Avis d'intention de participer |
2006-03-06 |
Avis d'intention de participer à la consultation publique |
2006-03-10 |
Observations des parties |
2006-03-27 (révisée) |
Consultation publique |
2006-05-02 au 2006-05-05 |
Observations |
2006-05-10 |
Répliques aux observations |
2006-06-06 (révisée) |
Répliques aux questions supplémentaires |
10 jours de la réception |
Liste des documents connexes
Section 1 - Documents du Conseil
a) Avis public, Décisions, etc.
b) Liste
des parties intéressées
c) Correspondance aux parties
Section 4 - Documents des parties
a) Correspondance au Conseil
b) Observations des parties
c) Observations
d) Répliques aux observations
e) Répliques aux questions supplémentaires
Section 8 - Documents divers
a) Frais
b) Autres
Section 1a) Avis public, Decision, etc.
2006-09-21 - Ordonnance de frais de télécom CRTC 2006-10
Demande d'adjudication de frais présentée par M. Mark Obermeyer
au nom de « 97 % des Canadiens » – Instance
visant à établir le cadre de la liste nationale de numéros
de téléphone exclus et à examiner les règles
de télémarketing, Avis public de télécom
CRTC 2006-4. Référence : 8665-C12-200601626 et
4754-267.
2006-03-13 - Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-4-1
Le Conseil modifie les échéanciers prévus pour soumettre
des observations écrites dans le cadre de l'avis Instance visant
à établir le cadre de la liste nationale de numéros
de téléphone exclus et à examiner les règles
de télémarketing , Avis public de télécom
CRTC 2006-4, 20 février 2006. Référence : 8665-C12-200601626,
8662-C131-200408543, 8662-F20-200409814, 8662-B48-200409228, 8662-A84-200410035.
2006-02-20 - Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-4
Le Conseil amorce une instance publique assortie d'une consultation publique,
concernant la création et l'exploitation d'une liste nationale
de numéros de téléphone exclus (LNNTE) ainsi que
l'établissement et la mise en application des règles concernant
la LNNTE et de toute autre règle relative au télémarketing.
Référence : 8665-C12-200601626, 8662-C131-200408543,
8662-F20-200409814, 8662-B48-200409228, 8662-A84-200410035.
Section 1c) Correspondance aux parties
2006-09-14 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Canadian Marketing Association
(CMA) - Objet: Demande d'adjudication de frais relativement à l'Avis
public 2006-4
intitulé Instance visant à établir le cadre de la
liste nationale de numéros de téléphone exclus et
à examiner les règles de télémarketing
2006-08-15 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties
à l’Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-4 - Objet :
Rapports du CDCI - Groupe de travail Fonctionnement de la liste nationale
de numéros de téléphone exclus (GTFL).
2006-06-12 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description : Lettre adressée aux parties
intéressées à l'AP 2006-4
- Objet : Répliques et résultats d'enquête déposés
par le Public Interest Law Centre (bureau du Manitoba) et la Manitoba
Society of Seniors
2006-05-18 - Questions
supplémentaires (révisée)
Description: Questions soulevées pendant la consultation publique
- 2 au 4 mai 2006
2006-05-18 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux parties
intéressées - Objet: Date révisé pour
les répliques aux observations concernant l'avis public 2006-4
2006-05-17 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux parties
intéressées - Objet: Texte des exposés
présentés au Conseil lors de la consultation publique concernant
l'Avis public 2006-4
2006-04-07 -
Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux parties
intéressées à l'avis public 2006-4
- Objet: Organisation et déroulement de l'audience publique avec
comparution concernant l'avis public 2006-4
2006-03-17 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Saskatchewan Telecommunications
- Objet: Mandat du sous-comité du CDCI sur l'exploitation de la
LNNTE
2006-03-06 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution
- Objet: Instance visant à établir le cadre de la liste
nationale de numéros de téléphone exclus et à
examiner les règles de télémarketing - Demande de
prorogation du délai concernant le dépôt des observations
Section 4a) Correspondance au Conseil
2006-11-07 - Canadian Newspaper Association (CNA)
Description: The Canadian Newspaper Association is writing in support
of the position of the Canadian Marketing Association (CMA) in its letter
to the CRTC dated October 24, 2006.
Document: 687526.pdf
- 37KO
2006-10-24 - Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: Thank you very much for your letter dated September 14, 2006.
The detail you provide regarding CRTC's historical interpretation of its
discretion to award costs to participants in a proceeding is very helpful.
Document: 682529.pdf
- 80KO
2008-08-18 - Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: It has just come to the Canadian Marketing Association's
(CMA's) attention that there may have been a formal deadline for application
for costs in the above-noted proceeding, even though those proceedings
are continuing. CMA has been actively involved not only in the public
proceeding but also as members of the Consortium Formation CISC Subcommittee,
the DNCL Operations CISC Subcommittee (the DOWG) and all of the subcommittees
to the subcommittees.
Document: 655780.pdf
- 71KO
2006-07-18 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: It has come to our attention that we have missed
the formal deadline for application for costs in the above-noted proceeding,
which we understand was July 16th.
Document: 650170.pdf
- 91KO
2006-06-01 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited
Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec,
société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (the
Companies)
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, NorthernTel,
Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications,
Télébec, société en commandite and TELUS Communications
Company (collectively, the Companies) have received the Reply submission
of the Consumer Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch) and the Manitoba
Society of Seniors (CAC/MSOS), dated 23 May 2006.
Document:
632015.doc - 41KO
2006-05-29 - Alberta Minister of Government Services
Description: I have recently been appointed as Minister of Government
Services, responsible for Consumer Services. I would like to take this
opportunity to congratulate you on the important progress you have made.
Document: 635635.pdf
- 45KO
2006-05-25
- Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: Further to our communication of
May 10, 2006 and to clarification provided to us concerning the CRTC submission
process, we are withdrawing the submission put forward under the heading
"Additional CMA Submission to CRTC Regarding 2006-4"
Document: 630532.pdf
- 73KO
2006-05-19 - The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association
(MRIA)
Description: Oral presentation to the May 2 - 5, 2006 Consultation
for Public Notice 2006-4
Document: 631214.pdf
- 30 KO
2006-05-19 - Canadian Association of Direct Response Insurers
(CADRI) Description: Oral presentation to the May 2 - 5, 2006
Consultation for Public Notice 2006-4
Document: 631203.doc
- 80KO
2006-05-17 - The People of Canada
Description: Oral presentation to the May 2 - 5, 2006 Consultation for
Public Notice 2006-4
Document: 631225.zip
- 44KO
2006-05-17 - Primerica
Description: Oral presentation to the May 2 - 5, 2006 Consultation
for Public Notice 2006-4
Document: 631195.doc
- 69KO
2006-05-17 - Canadian Bankers Association
Description: Oral presentation to the May 2 - 5, 2006 Consultation for
Public Notice 2006-4
Document: 631183.doc-
90KO
2006-05-17 - Canadian Jewish Congress
Description: Oral presentation to the May 2 - 5, 2006 Consultation
for Public Notice 2006-4
2006-05-17 - Advocis
Description: Oral presentation to the May 2 - 5, 2006 Consultation
for Public Notice 2006-4
2006-05-03 - Bell Canada
Description: The purpose of this letter is to inform Commission staff
of developments in the DCWG that will likely affect the timelines for
the implementation of the DNCL consortium, set out in Public Notice 2006-4.
Document: 622822.doc
- 65KO
2006-04-12 - Public Interest Law Centre
Description: Further to our telephone conversation and my voice mail
message to you, this letter is to thank you for your encouragement of
CAC/MSOS's participation at the public consultation. My clients and I
certainly appreciate your willingness to accommodate us to the extent
possible.
Document: 618414.pdf
- 75KO
2006-04-06 - Investment Dealers of Canada (IDA)
Description: This is in response to the Commission's letter of March
29, 2006 advising that the IDA will not be scheduled to participate in
the public consultation to be held on May 2 to 5, 2006.
Document: 611774.pdf
- 94KO
2006-03-13 - Aliant Telecom inc., Bell Canada, Northerntel, MTS,
Northwestel, SaskTel, Télébec and Telus (the companies)
Description: At paragraph 34 - 39 in Telecom Public Notice 2006-4, the
Commission acknowledges that there are a number of technical and operational
issues that need to be addressed in the development and implementation
of a national Do not call list in Canada.
Document: 608209.pdf
- 112KO
2006-03-07 - Mouvement des caisses Desjardins
Description: Compte tenu des enjeux et de l'ampleur du mandat du Conseil,
nous estimons qu'il serait à l'avantage de tous les intéressés
d'obtenir l'autorisation de remettre leurs commentaires au plus tard le
7 avril 2006
Document: 600478.pdf
- 54KO
2006-03-07 - Canadian Marketing Association
Description: The Canadian Marketing Association is in receipt
of letters from PIAC, Rogers and the Public Interest Law Centre to the
Commission, requesting an extension for interested parties to file comments
on the above-noted proceeding from March 20, 2006 to April 3, 2006.
Document: 599673.pdf
- 87KO
2006-03-07 - Canadian Bankers Association
Description: Further to the letters you have receivedfrom the Public Interest
Advocacy Centre, the Public Interest Law Centre and Rogers Communiations
Inc., the Canadian Bankers Association hereby registers its interest in
participating inthe consultations and in supporting the other parties'
request for an extension for interest parties to file comments in the
above-noted proceeding from March 2, 2006 to April 3, 2006.
Document: 599139.pdf
- 185KO
2006-03-07 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream is in receipt of the Commission's letter dated
6 March 2006 regarding a letter dated 2 March 2006 from the Public Interest
Advocacy Centre (PIAC) requesting an extension of time for interested
parties to file comments in the above-named proceeding to 2 April 2006.
Document: 599129.pdf
- 46KO
2006-03-07 - TELUS Communications Company (TCC)
Description: TELUS is in receipt of correspondence dated March
2, 2006, as revised March 6, 2006, from the Public Interest Advocacy Association
(PIAC) representing the Consumers' Association of Canada and L'Union des
consommateurs (the Consumer Groups) seeking to extend the deadline for
initial comments in the above-referenced proceeding from March 20, 2006
to April 3, 2006.
Document: 599119.pdf
- 16KO
2006-03-07 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumers'
Association of Canada
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel
for the Consumers’ Association of Canada is writing with regard
to its previous application for an extension of time for filing comments
on any matter within the scope of this proceeding to Monday, April 3,
2006
Document: 599106.doc
- 123KO
2006-03-06 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers is in receipt of PIAC's letter to the Commission,
dated March 2, 2006, requesting an extension for interested parties to
file comments in the above-noted proceeding from march 20, 2006 to April
3, 2006.
Document: 598635.pdf
- 42KO
2006-03-03 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited
Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec,
société en commandité (the Companies)
Description: The following is submitted on behalf of Aliant Telecom Inc.,
Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan
Telecommunications and Télébec, société en
commandité (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 598082.doc
- 50KO
2006-03-02 - Public Interest Law Centre
Description: We have received a copy of Mr. Lawford's letter regarding
the Public Interet Advocacy Centre's request for an extension of time
to file comments to April 3, 2006.
Document: 598472.pdf
- 63KO
2006-03-02 - Public Interest Advocacy
Centre (PIAC)
Description: PIAC is therefore writing to seek an extension of time for
filing comments on any matter within the scope of this proceeding to Monday,
April 3, 2006.
Document: 597706.doc
- 125KO
Section
4b) Observations des parties
2006-05-17 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre for the Consumers'
Association of Canada
Description: The Canadian Newspaper Association (CNA) submits
these reply comments to the Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications
Commission (CRTC) to ensure the public record is clear on where the Canadian
newspaper industry stands in terms of the Do-Not-Call-List (DNCL).
Document: 626315.pdf
- 38KO
2006-05-17 - Canadian Jewish Congress
Description: Attached please find an electronic version of the oral
submission of Canadian Jewish Congress in regard to Telecom Public Notice
CRTC 2006-04.
Document: 626055.doc
- 47KO
2006-05-12 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel for
the Consumers’ Association of Canada (CAC) is writing with regard
to the “second submission” of the Canadian Marketing Association
(CMA) dated May 10, 2006. Public Notice 2006-4 clearly provides a process
for parties to the proceedings. The CMA is a party and fully participated
in this process, receiving all submissions.
Document: 624741.doc
- 125KO
2006-05-11 - Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)
Description: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the views
of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) relative to
the CRTC’s public consultations on the creation and operation of
a national do not call list (DNCL), as well as the establishment and enforcement
of national DNCL rules and other rules related to telemarketing.
Document: 624755.doc
- 42KO
2006-05-10 - MBNA Canada Inc.
Description: In consideration of Bill C-37, an Act to amend the Telecommunications
Act.
Document: 625999.pdf
- 148KO
2006-05-10 - General Motors Canada Limited
Description: Comments from General Motors Canada Limited regarding Telecom
Public Notice CRTC 2006-4 on the establishment of a national do not call
list framework and to review the telemarketing rules
Document: 624775.pdf
- 227KO
2006-05-10 - Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: Based on a greater understanding of new information, particularly
as a result of (CISC) committee activity surrounding the Public Notice
process, the CMA welcomes the opportunity to provide the CRTC with this
second submission on Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4.
Document:
624762.pdf - 111KO
2006-05-10 - Direct Energy
Description: Direct Energy welcomes the opportunity to provide the CRTC
with this submission on the above noted notice
Document: 624747.pdf
- 34KO
2006-05-10 - Canadian Jewish Congress/Congrès
Juif canadien
Description: Canadian Jewish Congress, on its behalf as well as on behalf
of the Jewish Federations in Canada , very much appreciated the opportunity
to appear before the CRTC regarding Telecom Public Notice 2006-4.
Pursuant to our exchange with Commissioners, we are pleased now to provide
you with additional insights into the issues we raised concerning exempt
status for groups associated with registered charities and the exemption
in respect of call display.
Document: 624716.doc
- 557KO
2006-05-10 - Coalition of Fundraising Service Providers
Description: Attached please find comments of the Coalition of Fundraising
Service Providers in response to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4 and
filed pursuant to paragraph 56 of PN 2006-4.
Document: 624721.pdf
- 369KO
2006-03-27 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission
in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4, 20 February 2006, as revised by
Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4-1, 13 March 2006 (collectively referred
to as PN 06-4), Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) hereby
files its comments on a number of the issues raised in section II of PN
06-4.
Document: 607323.doc
- 88KO
2006-03-27 - TBayTel
Description: On February 20, 2006, the Commission initiated this proceeding
to consider the requirements for the creation and operation of a National
Do Not Call List (DNCL). This process will also deal with the establishment
and enforcement of national DNCL rules and any other rules related to
telemarketing
Document: 607338.doc
- 715KO
2006-03-27 - Union des consommateurs
Description: L’Union des consommateurs dépose le présent
document afin de soumettre des observations dans le cadre de l’avis
public de télécom CRTC 2006-4.
Document: 607332.doc
- 136KO
2006-03-27 - Public Interest Institute (Institute)
Description: The Public Interest Institute (Institute) is an organization
established to ensure that there is public interest representation in
matters affecting Canadian consumers. Among other things, it represents
the interests of Canadians by conducting research, creating public awareness
and participating in public proceedings.
Document: 607327.doc
- 53KO
2006-03-28 -The (People of Canada
Description: This submission is on behalf of the 97% of Canadians who
fild all forms of telemarketing anoying, and want it stopped, immediately
and permanently.
Document: 607343.pdf
- 19KO
2006-03-27 - Primerica Financial Services (Canada) Ltd.
Description: Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the CRTC
proceedings on the development and operation of a national Do Not Call
List (DNCL) in Canada.
Document: 607309.doc
- 45KO
2006-03-27 - ContactNB
Description: On behalf of ContactNB, the provincial association representing
the interests of the customer contact centre industry in New Brunswick,
I am pleased to submit preliminary comments for consideration in the above-noted
proceeding which will determine rules for the national Do Not Call list
authorized by Bill C-37.
Document: 607317.doc
- 66KO
2006-03-27 - NuComm International (NuComm)
Description: NuComm International (NuComm) is pleased to have the opportunity
to participate in these important proceedings. NuComm is Canada’s
largest privately held contact centre organization with over 3,000 employees
in 10 offices nation-wide.
Document: 607102.doc
- 39KO
2006-03-27 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: We are counsel in this proceeding for British Columbia Old
Age Pensioners' Organization, Active Support Against Poverty, BC Coalition
of People with Disabilities, Council of Senior Citizens' Organizations
of BC, End Legislated Poverty, federated anti-poverty groups of BC, and
Tenants’ Rights Action Coalition, collectively referenced for convenience
as “BCOAPO et al.” We write to provide the submissions of
BCOAPO et al. regarding the national Do Not Call List Framework and the
Telemarketing Rules.
Document: 607238.doc
- 81KO
2006-03-27 - Credit Union Central of Canada (Canadian Central)
Description: On behalf of Credit Central of Canada (Canadian Central),
I am pleased to submit comments for consideration in the above-referenced
proceeding, which determine rules for the national Do not call list as
outlined in Bill C-37.
Document: 607236.pdf
- 523KO
2006-03-27 - Infolink Technologies Ltd. (Infolink)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission
in the above-noted Public Notice 2006-4, as amended in public notice 2006-4-1,
Infolink is pleased to submit its initial comments in the proceeding to
establish a national do not call list framework.
Document: 607223.pdf
- 1,203KO
2006-03-27 - Infolink Technologies Ltd. (Infollink)
Description: Infolink notes that the Commission has determined that certain
issues it has identified in relation to operation of the National do not
call list, as referred to in section I(b) of PN 2006-4, are best resolved
in the DCNL Operations CISC Subcommittee.
Document: 607200.pdf
- 347KO
2006-03-27 - Association of Fundraising Professionals
Description: Please find attached the comments of the Association of Fundraising
Professionals regarding PN CRTC 2006-4.
Document: 607144.zip
- 70KO
2006-03-27 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications is filing these comments in accordance
with the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Pbulic Notice
2006-4.
Document: 607136.pdf
- 68KO
2006-03-27 - Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA)
Description: These comments and recommendations are provided by the Investment
Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) in response to Telecom Public Notice
2006-4.
Document: 607117.pdf
- 67KO
2006-03-27 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Allstream
Inc., NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan
Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite,
and TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 7 of Telecom Public Notice
CRTC 2006-4-1, Proceeding to establish a national do not call list framework
and to review the telemarketing rules (PN 2006-4), the following comments
are provided by Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Allstream Inc.,
NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications,
Télébec, Société en commandite, and TELUS
Communications Company (TELUS) (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 606927.doc
- 448KO
2006-03-27 - Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: The CMA welcomes the opportunity to provide the CRTC with
this submission on Telecom Public Notice 2006-4.
Document: 606961.pdf
- 189KO
2006-03-27 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for the Consumers'
Association of Canada
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel for
the Consumers’ Association of Canada is pleased to enclose the following
comments on this proceeding.
Document: 606619.zip
- 113KO
2006-03-27 - Mouvement des caisses Desjardins
Description: Vous trouverez ci-joint le mémoire du Mouvement des
caisses Desjardins concernant le sujet cité en rubrique.
Document: 606956.pdf
- 54KO
2006-03-27 - Public Interest Law Centre on behalf of Consumers
Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch) and Manitoba Society of Seniors
(CAC/MSOS)
Description: The following comments are submitted on behalf of Consumers
Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch) and Manitoba Society of Seniors
(CAC/MSOS) for consideration by the DNCL Operations SICS Subcommittee.
Document: 606951.pdf
- 144KO
2006-03-27 - Canadian Bankers Association (CBA)
Description: In response to the Commission's invitation to provide comments
with respect to issues raised in Telecom Public Notice 2006-4, I am pleased
to attach the banking industry's views.
Document: 606947.zip
- 117KO
2006-03-27 - Independent Financial Brokers (IFB)
Description: Independent Financial Brokers of Canada (IFB) is pleased
to submit our comments for consideration in the above-referenced proceeding,
which will determine the rules for the National Do Not Call list (DNCL)
authorized by Bill C-37.
Document: 606610.doc
- 93KO
2006-03-27 - Meloche Monnex Inc.
Description: TD Meloche Monnex, the third-largest provider of home and
auto insurance in Canada, operates through direct-response distribution
methods, providing value and convenience to a rapidly growing clientele.
Document: 606605.doc
- 77KO
2006-03-27 - Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association Inc.
Description: Attached is a copy of a submission of the Canadian Life and
Health Insurance Association regarding Telecom Public Notice 2006-4 Proceeding
to establish a national do not call list framework and to review the telemarketing
rules.
Document: 606941.zip
- 134KO
2006-03-27 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw, or, the Company) is pleased
to offer the following comments for Commission consideration in the context
of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4 (PN 2006-4).
Document: 606600.doc
- 55KO
2006-03-27 - Xit Télécom inc.
Description: Conformement aux procedures du Conseil a l'Appel Public 2006-4
et telles que modifiees dans la lettre du Conseil datee du 6 mars 2006,
Xit telecom inc., en son nom ainsi qu'au nom de Telecommunications Xittel
inc., et de 9141-9077 Quebec inc. (Xit telecom) vous fait part de ses
commentaires.
Document: 606932.doc
- 19KO
2006-03-27 - Canadian Association of Direct Response Insurers
(CADRI)
Description: On behalf of the Canadian Association of Direct Response
Insurers (CADRI), I am pleased to submit comments for consideration in
the above-referenced proceeding, which will determine rules for the national
Do Not Call list authorized by Bill C-37.
Documen: 606598.doc
- 80KO
2006-03-27 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Consumers
Association of Canada (Manitoba Society of Seniors CAC/MSOS for consideration
by the Commission.
Document: 606819.pdf
- 149KO
2006-03-27 - Canadian Association of Financial Institutions in
Insurance (CAFII)
Description: I am writing on behalf of the CAFII with regard to Public
CRTC 2006-4.
Document: 606684.pdf
- 167KO
2006-03-24 - Advocis
Description: Advocis appreciates the opportunity to provide its comments
to the CRTC on CRTC Public Notice 2006-4, the establishment of a national
do not call list (DNCL) framework.
Document: 606817.pdf
- 97KO
2006-03-25 - Darren, Gahan
Description: These comments are in SUPPORT OF THE NATIONAL DO NOT CALL
LIST. Marketing, Direct Marketing, and Telemarketing and or any other
form of Marketing (Hereafter called Marketer) need to have strict regulations.
This is especially necessary when the Marketers use ways and means that
are paid for by the public.
Document: 606759.doc
- 6KO
2006-03-24 - Marketing Research and Intelligence Association
(MRIA)
Description: The MRIA - the voice of the market and survey research industry
in Canada - is pleased to submit these comments to the CRTC in response
to the above-noted Public Notice.
Document: 606726.pdf
- 34KO
2006-03-24 - Canadian Newspaper Association (CNA)
Description: The attached comments have been filed by the CNA in response
to the process initiated by the Commission on February 20, 2006, as noted
above.
Document: 606697.zip
- 57KO
2006-03-22 - Canadian Jewish Congress
Description: Attached please find the submission of the Canadian Jewish
Congress in reference to Public Notice 2006-4
Document: 607680.doc
- 53KO
2006-03-22 - Direct Marketing Association (DMA)
Description: The Direct Marketing Association, Inc. Of the United States
(DMA) submits the following comments with respect especially to paragraphs
47 and 48 of the Telecom Public Notice 2006-4.
Document: 606708.pdf
- 393KO
2006-03-17 - RESP Dealers Association of Canada
Description: The following comments are submitted on behalf of the
RESP Dealers Association of Canada (RESPDAC) in response to the above-noted
public notice.
Document: 606674.pdf
- 37KO
Section 4c) Observations
Observations reçu électroniquement
Section 4d) Répliques aux observations
2006-06-06 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy
Centre
Description: We write to provide brief reply submissions regarding
the national Do Not Call List Framework and the Telemarketing Rules.
2006-06-06 - Canadian Bankers Association
Description: Attached are the reply comments of the Canadian Bankers Association
re Telecom Public Notice 2006-4 on the establishment of the National Do
Not Call List.
Document: 634706.pdf
- 95KO
2006-06-06 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“RCI”) is filing
these reply comments in accordance with the procedures established by
the Commission in Proceeding to establish a national do not call list
framework and to review the telemarketing rules, Telecom Public Notice
CRTC 2006-4, 20 February 2006 (Public Notice 2006-4).
Document: 634702.pdf
- 82KO
2006-06-06 - Primerica
Description: In their comments and replies to comments, a number
of stakeholders have proposed various measures intended to lend clarity
to the interpretation of exemptions and the scope of the national Do Not
Call List (DNCL).
Document: 634701.doc
- 38KO
2006-06-06 - Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: The Canadian Marketing Association (CMA) has been pleased
to be involved in all aspects of the proceedings related to the CRTC
Public Notice CRTC 2006-4.
Document: 634700.pdf
- 216KO
2006-06-06 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Allstream
Inc., NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan
Telecommunications, Télébec, société en commandite,
and TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 60 of Telecom Public
Notice CRTC 2006-4, the following reply comments are provided by Aliant
Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Allstream Inc., NorthernTel, Limited Partnership,
Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec,
société en commandite, and TELUS Communications Company
(TELUS) (collectively, the Companies). Document: 633101.doc
- 363KO
2006-06-05 - The People of Canada
Description: Thank you for the opportunity to reply to the undertakings
received from the other parties after the public consultation.
Document: 636394.pdf
- 110KO
2006-06-02 - Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association Inc.
Description: In their comments and replies to comments, a number of
stakeholders have proposed various measures intended to lend clarity to
the interpretation of exemptions and the scope of the national Do Not
Call List (DNCL).
Document: 634697.pdf
- 22KO
2006-06-02 - Public Interest Law Centre
Description: This letter is in response to the Companies' letter to you
of June 1,2006 objecting to the content of the reply comments filed by
CAC/MSOS.
CAC/MSOS wishes to respond to the allegations made by the Companies in
its letter and also to explain its reasons for including the survey results
in that Reply. Document: 634693.pdf
- 95KO
2006-05-23 - Advocis
Description: We reiterate our support of the Government’s efforts
to alleviate telemarketing irritations for Canadians while recognizing
the need to continue to foster a competitive environment for businesses
in Canada.
Document: 629118.pdf
- 71KO
2006-05-23 - Consumers Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch)
and Manitoba Society of Seniors (CAC/MSOS)
Description: The CAC/MSOS are pleased to be able to provide the
Commission with its reply comments.
Document: 628876.pdf
- 99KO
2006-05-23 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumers'
Association of Canada
Descrition: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel
for the Consumers’ Association of Canada is pleased to enclose the
following final reply comments on this proceeding.
Document: 628695.zip
- 123KO
2006-05-23 - Association of Fundraising Professionals
Description: Attached please find a copy of the Reply Comments of the
Association of Fundraising Professionals together with the Part VII Application
to Review and Vary (which forms part of the Reply Comments).
Document: 628687.zip
- 2608KO
Section 4e) Répliques aux questions supplémentaires
2006-06-22 - Advocis
Description: At our May 2, 2006 appearance regarding the establishment
of a national do not call list (DNCL) framework, Advocis was asked to
provide the Commission with further details on: cost estimates, a member
poll and disciplinary procedures.
Document: 637819.pdf
- 70KO
2006-06-02 - The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association
(MRIA)
Description: The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association (MRIA)
is pleased to respond to Commissioner Barbara Cram’s request for
additional information, made at the May 3 public consultation event for
Public Notice 2006-4.
Document: 631488.zip
- 155KO
2006-06-01 - Canadian Marketing Association
Description: The Canadian Marketing Association (CMA) is pleased to provide
CRTC with the following responses to the Undertakings received May
2, 2006 pursuant to Telecom Public Notice 2006-4.
Document: 631233.pfd
- 173KO
2006-05-24 - L'union des consommateurs
Description: L’Union des consommateurs dépose le présent
document afin de soumettre des réponses aux questions du Conseil
faisant suite à l’audience publique relative à l’avis
public de télécom CRTC 2006-4.
Document: 630456.doc
- 847KO
2006-05-24 - RESP Dealers Association of Canada
Description: At the CRTC public consultation session respecting
the Do Not Call List (Wednesday May 3rd) our organization put
forth the position that people who have specifically requested contact
from an organization should be able to be contacted even though they may
have registered on the DNCL. The committee asked me to provide a sample
of one our lead generation pieces for their review in consideration of
this point. When you and spoke afterwards about this you suggested that
to satisfy the undertaking I email you an example.
Document: 629415.pdf
- 188KO
2006-05-19 - Canadian Bankers Association
Description: At the May 2 - 5, 2006 public consultations with respect
to Telecom Public notice CRTC 2006-4, the Commission provided various
parties, including the Canadian Bankers Association, with Undertakings
to provide information on five topics.
Document: 629234.pdf
- 92KO
Description: Attached are the responses of Primerica to six undertakings
received from the CRTC during the public hearings for PN 2006-4 that were
held on May 2-4, 2006.
Document: 626629.zip
- 125KO
2006-05-18 - Advocis
Description: At our May 2 appearance regarding the establishment of
a national do not call list (DNCL) framework, Advocis was asked to provide
the Commission with further details on three matters. Following is information
on the items requested.
Document: 626722.zip
- 149KO
2006-05-17
- Public Interest Advocacy Centre for the Consumers' Association of
Canada
Description: We are counsel to the Consumer Groups (Consumers' Association
of Canada, National Anti-Poverty Organization, L'Union des consommateurs)
in the above-noted proceeding. We are pleased to enclose the answers
to undertakings given at the oral hearing in this matter, held on May
2-4, 2006.
Document: 626330.zip
(révisée)- 107KO
2006-05-16 - Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association
(CLHIA)
Description: Attached are the responses of the Canadian Life and
Health Insurance Association to four undertakings received from the
CRTC during the public hearings for PN 2006-4 that were held on May
2-4, 2006.
Document: 626178.zip
- 40KO
2006-05-16 - ContactNB
Description: Once again, we would like to thank the CRTC for including
our Association in the public hearings for the subject notice. We are
in receipt of several questions posed of the Association in response
to our submission, and hereby offer the following response.
Document: 626045.doc
- 61KO
2006-05-15 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) submits its responses
to the interrogatories given to it at the conclusion of its appearance
at the public consultation on Wednesday, May 3, 2006.
Document: 626293.zip
- 142KO
2006-05-15 - Bell Canada (The Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the public consultation phase of the proceeding
initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4, the attached responses
to undertakings are provided by Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS.
Document: 626146.zip
- 92KO
Section 8a) Frais
2006-09-25 - TELUS Communications Company
TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of an
application for costs from the British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy
Centre (BCPIAC) dated 17 July 2006 and received 15 September 2006. Pursuant
to Section 44 of the CRTC Telecommunication Rules of Procedure (“the
Rules”). TELUS herein provides its response to BCPIAC’s application
for costs.
Document: 670966.pdf
- 24KO
2006-09-21 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada, NorthernTel,
Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications
(SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite
(the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership,
Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan
Telecommunications and T é lébec, sociét é
en commandite (collectively, the Companies) , are in receipt of an application
for costs from the BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre (BCOAPO et al) dated
17 July 2006 and received 15 September 2006 . The Companies
do not object to the applicant's entitlement to costs or to the amount
claimed.
Document: 669888.doc
- 32KO
2006-09-18 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers is in receipt of a request for an award of costs
from the British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre (BCPIAC), for
$4,736.50 for participation by these parties in Proceeding to establish
a national do not call list framework and to review the telemarketing
rules, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4, 20 February 2006 (Public Notice
2006-4).
Document: 669860.pdf
- 52KO
2006-09-15 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: Further to Bell Canada's letter of September 12, 2006
regarding our application for costs on behalf of BCOAPO et al., we are
serving all interested parties with our application of July 17, 2006.
Document: 667706.zip
- 47KO
2006-09-12 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada (or the Company) , has become aware of an application
for costs from the British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre on
behalf of the BC Old Age Pensioners' Organization et al (BCOAPO et al)
dated 17 July 2006.
Document: 666885.doc
- 77KO
2006-08-14 - Telus Communications Inc.
Description: Telus Communications Inc. (TELUS) is in receipt of applications
for costs from the Consumer Association of Canada (CAC) dated and received
1 August 2006.
Document: 653846.pdf
- 22KO
2006-08-08 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: In the context of PN 2006-4, costs applications have
been submitted by the Consumers Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch)
and the Manitoba Society of Seniors (CAC/MSOS), L'Union des Consommateurs,
and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers Association
of Canada.
Document: 652161.doc
- 57KO
2006-08-04 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada, NorthernTel,
Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications
(SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite
(the Companies)
Description: The Companies are in receipt of an application
for costs from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers
Association of Canada (CAC) dated 1 August 2006 . The Companies
do not object to the applicant's entitlement to costs. The Companies
do not object to the amount claimed, with the exception that the GST amount
should be $357.42, not $714.84.
Document: 651511.doc
- 32KO
2006-07-17 - BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre for BC Old
Age Pensioners' Organization et al
Description: The BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre applies
on behalf of the BC Old Age Pensioners' Organization et al. for costs
in these proceedings.
Document: 650165.pdf
- 418KO
2006-08-03 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Desccription: Rogers is in receipt of the Public Interest Advocacy
Centre's (PIAC) request for award of costs, dated August 1, 2006, in the
amount of $12,937.22 for participation by this partis as counsel for the
Consumers' Association of Canada (CAC in Telecom Public Notice 2006-4,
20 February 2006.
Document: 651014.pdf
- 52KO
2006-08-01 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumers'
Association of Canada (CAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel
for the Consumers’ Association of Canada (CAC) in the above-noted
hearing, respectfull submits the attached the costs claim.
Document: 650134.doc
- 130KO
2006-07-26 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of applications for costs from L'Union
des Consommateurs dated 26 June 2006 and received 17 July 2006 and the
Consumers Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch) and the Manitoba Society
for Seniors (CACMSOS) dated 17 July 2006 and received 19 July 2006.
Document: 648219.pdf
- 23KO
2006-07-25 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership,
Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec,
société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
(Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel
Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société
en commandite (collectively, the Companies) , are in receipt of an application
for costs from the Public Interest Law Centre on behalf of the Consumers
Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch) and the Manitoba Society of Seniors
(CAC/MSOS) dated 17 July 2006 .
Document: 647923.doc
- 30KO
2006-07-24 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers is in receipt of requests for an award of
costs from the Consumer Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch) and the
Manitoba Society of Seniors (CAC/MSOS), for $11,592 and L'Union des consommateurs,
for $9.523.60, for participation by these parties in Telecom Public Notice
2006-4, 20 February 2006.
Document: 647180.pdf
- 53KO
2006-07-17 - Public Interest Law Centre for Consumers Association
of Canada (Manitoba Branch) and Manitoba Society of Seniors (CAC/MSOS)
Description: On behalf of Consumers Association of Canada (Manitoba
Branch) and Manitoba Society of Seniors (CAC/MSOS), I am writing to apply
for an award of costs with respect to the above noted proceeding.
Document: 645276.doc
- 99KO
2006-07-17 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Patnership,
Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec,
société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: The Companies are in receipt of an application for costs
from Union des consommateur, dated 26 June 2006 and received on 4 July
2006. The Companies do not object to the applicant's entitlement to costs
or the amount claimed.
Document: 645254.doc
- 34KO
2006-06-26 - L' Union des consommateurs
Description: Conformément à l'article 44 des
Règles de procédure du CRTC en matière de télécommunications
et à l'avis public CRTC 2002-5, l'Union des consommateurs demande
l'adjudication de ses frais pour sa participation à l'avis public
de télécom CRTC 2006-4.
Document: 642966.pdf
- 380KO
2006-05-30 - Telus Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS") is in receipt
of an application for costs from Mr. Mark Obermeyer, dated 10 May 2006
and received 18 May 2006. TELUS herein provides its response to Mr. Obermeyer's
application for costs.
Document: 630663.pdf
- 27KO
2005-05-30 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited
Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec,
sociét é en commandite (collectively, the Companies)
Description: The Companies do not object to the amount claimed; the
Companies do object to Mr. Obermeyer's eligibility to receive costs.
Document: 630371.doc
- 272KO
2006-05-30 - The People of Canada
Description: Revised costs application, resubmitted per a new
request from Susan Gardiner to use a certain form.
Document: 630564.zip-
500KO
2006-05-10 - The People of Canada
Description: Pursuant to Section 44 of the
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION, we have tallied up the actual out-of-pocket
costs of our delegate's attendance at the May 2-5, 2006 public consultation
for PN 2006-4, and now apply to have these costs re-imbursed.
Document: 626758.zip
- 910KO
Section 8b) Autres
Aucun documents
Mise à jour : 2006-11-08 |