Canada
Français
Contact Us
Help
Search
Canada Site

About Us

Media Room

Library

Home
Achieving a Balance
" " Energy &
Climate Change
" " Capital Markets
" " Eco-Fiscal Reform
& Energy
About
2005 Recommendations
Previous Recommendations
Links
Program Contact
   
" "Brownfields
Subscribe to NRTEE e-briefs
Email thisEmail this

 

© 2006

-
""
" "
Natural Capital:
A Critical Foundation of Our Economy

Improving the information base on natural capital

2.1 Why We Need Improved Information About Natural Capital

In the 2000 spring budget, the Minister of Finance observed that “we must come to grips with the fact that the current means of measuring progress are inadequate.” He then asked the NRTEE to develop a set of national indicators that Finance Canada and other decision makers could use to track the impact of current economic practices on the natural and human assets that will be needed by future generations of Canadians. The resulting report, Environment and Sustainable Development Indicators for Canada (released in May 2003), concluded that Canada’s indicators and information systems need to take better account of the natural, human and social capital assets that are necessary to sustain a dynamic economy and healthy society.

 

Tracking more complete information about Canada’s full set of capital assets would help Canadians avoid decisions that inadvertently deplete key human and natural assets, or that under-invest in the protection or enhancement of assets that may be necessary to realize future development opportunities. Providing good information on the full range of important national assets will require significant improvements in the type and quality of information collected at the national level.

The NRTEE’s report on indicators made three major sets of recommendations to ensure that the information base for making decisions on fiscal and other policy accounts more fully for natural, human and social capital:

  • Statistics Canada should publish annually the six indicators of natural and human capital identified by the NRTEE, and the Minister of Finance should incorporate them in the federal budget statement in order to provide Canadians with a better context for understanding the overall state and potential of our economy.
  • Statistics Canada should expand Canada’s System of National Accounts to include information on all types of capital, including natural capital, and the interactions among the various types of capital.
  • The federal government, through Environment Canada’s Canadian Information System for the Environment (CISE), should improve the data structures and information systems relating to environmental data.

The six indicators identified by the NRTEE include five for natural capital and one for human capital:

  • The Forest Cover indicator tracks changes in the extent of Canada’s forests – a key natural resource and provider of ecosystem services such as habitat for wildlife. Because this indicator is based on satellite data, it can be regularly updated, something that was not possible with earlier national forest indicators in Canada.
  • The Freshwater Quality indicator shows the extent to which Canada’s freshwater bodies are meeting objectives for uses such as swimming, irrigation and sustaining aquatic life, revealing trends in how many monitored waterways are classified as “marginal” or “poor.” The indicator calculated in the report, although still in a preliminary form, is the first national aggregation of this type of water quality data in Canada.
  • The Air Quality indicator is estimated using ground-level ozone (“smog”) measurements. This indicator is the first readily available Canadian measure of air quality that weights exposure to a pollutant by population. In other words, this indicator tries to factor in the number of people who are exposed to low-level ozone, as well as the ambient concentrations of ozone in different parts of the country. Ozone is the current focus of the indicator because of the well-understood links between exposure and health problems. It is hoped that other pollutants will eventually be incorporated into the indicator.
  • The Greenhouse Gas Emissions indicator, already calculated by Environment Canada, tracks total annual emissions of greenhouse gases. All of the gases tracked in this indicator are likely affecting the stability of the global climate.
  • The Extent of Wetlands indicator will track changes in the total area of wetlands. Wetlands provide many essential ecosystem services: they supply habitat and food for many species, purify water and store large quantities of carbon. Moreover, by retaining and releasing large volumes of water, they help replenish ground water, control floods and storm waters, reduce erosion and protect shorelines. Wetlands also indirectly support a range of economic activities such as fishing, farming and recreational activities.

Like the forest cover indicator, this indicator will be based on satellite data. This is the only indicator that cannot be reported at present, although it could be produced in approximately two years with suitable funding.

  • The Educational Attainment indicator tracks the percentage of the working-age population with post-secondary education. This indicator will reveal Canada’s investment in educating its workforce and will help us understand our ability to compete in a global, knowledge-based economy.

These indicators are simple and easy to understand. They illustrate some of the more important natural and human capital that must be maintained for the future. Reporting on them in each federal budget would help supplement the information provided by traditional macroeconomic indicators such as gross domestic product (GDP). In particular, they would provide a more balanced set of signals regarding the impacts of current policies and activities on Canada’s ability to sustain development into the future. But much remains to be done. More work is required to refine each indicator, and funding is needed to ensure that they can be reported on an annual basis.

The indicators provide a quick overview of the state of some key types of human and natural capital. Detailed analysis and decision making, however, will necessitate a comprehensive information system that links all types of capital (natural, human and social) with economic information.

To create such an information system, the NRTEE proposes a long-term process to reform Canada’s System of National Accounts (SNA). As in other countries, Canada’s SNA provides the information upon which all macroeconomic indicators are based, but collects very little information about Canada’s natural, human or social capital. Adding accounts to track these types of capital makes it possible to study important interactions: the analysis of climate change, for instance, would greatly benefit from an information system that would coherently link data on natural capital (e.g., greenhouse gas emissions) with economic data (e.g., the activities that lead to greenhouse gas emissions). The expansion of the SNA, while not modifying any of the existing economic accounts, would permit analysis of a more complete set of relevant factors, as well as the development of more informed and more coherent fiscal, industrial and environmental policies.

Statistics Canada will develop the new capital accounts within the SNA. However, populating these accounts with data will require the assistance of many different data providers. In particular, the NRTEE has concluded that Canada needs to greatly improve the quantity, quality and accessibility of information about natural capital. Among other things, this will require continued support for Environment Canada’s Canadian Information System for the Environment (CISE).

2.2 Budget Recommendations

This submission’s recommendations focus on starting to implement the three main recommendations of the NRTEE’s report on indicators:

  • providing funding to develop and regularly report the small set of natural and human capital indicators identified by the NRTEE;
  • initiating the long-term expansion of Canada’s System of National Accounts to include information on all types of capital, including natural capital; and
  • funding the Canadian Information System for the Environment to create consistent national databases on issues such as biodiversity and water quality.

2.2.1 Develop and Report Environment and Sustainable Development Indicators

The six indicators developed by the NRTEE will supplement macroeconomic indicators such as GDP, highlight the importance Canadians attach to national capital assets, and help track Canada’s progress in preserving and enhancing the country’s natural capital.

The NRTEE therefore recommends that Statistics Canada publish the indicators annually and that the Department of Finance incorporate them into each federal budget statement. Funding is also required to improve the indicators. For the time being, efforts should focus on developing the wetlands indicator (Natural Resources Canada and Environment Canada), and improving the water quality (Environment Canada) and forest cover (Natural Resources Canada) indicators.

Recommendation 1: That Statistics Canada, Environment Canada and Natural Resources Canada be provided with $5 million a year to continuously improve and regularly report the recommended indicators of natural and human capital.


2.2.2 Expand the System of National Accounts

The NRTEE recommends that the System of National Accounts be expanded to include accounts on the natural, human and social capital so vital to current and future development. Once developed, the new accounts will help to create a comprehensive, coherent information system that provides linkages among environmental, social and economic issues.

Although much can be accomplished in the short to medium term, fully expanding and improving the SNA will take several years and will involve several data collection agencies. Working with other departments such as Environment Canada, Statistics Canada has prepared a long-term work plan for this initiative. This work plan requires the allocation of stable, base-budget funding at a level sufficient to cover both data collection and data integration costs.

Recommendation 2: That Statistics Canada be provided with $20 million a year to begin the process of collecting and integrating the data needed to expand Canada’s System of National Accounts so that it includes all types of natural, human and, eventually, social capital.

 

2.2.3 Support the Canadian Information System for the Environment

Although the System of National Accounts will provide a structured approach to relating trends in natural, human and, eventually, social capital to economic trends, these new accounts will have to be populated with data.

In parallel with the NRTEE’s work on indicators, Environment Canada has been working on the Canadian Information System for the Environment, a project that will dramatically expand the collection, management, integration, assessment and communication of environmental data and knowledge at the national level. In particular, CISE will help create databases that are regularly updated, something that the NRTEE found sorely lacking, even for critical environmental matters such as water quality. Over time, CISE will also enhance national consistency and coherence in environmental data, and will help set national priorities for monitoring programs. These databases will be the source for much of the information to be included in the enhanced System of National Accounts.

CISE also has a key role to play outside the System of National Accounts by providing access to environmental information relevant to federal environmental responsibilities (toxics management, ecosystem quality, climate change, etc.).

Although CISE has been approved in principle, it has not yet been funded for full-scale operation. To date, CISE’s activities have been supported by the temporary reallocation of funds within Environment Canada’s current budget. To be effective, it needs financial certainty.

Recommendation 3: That Environment Canada be provided with $20 million a year to enable CISE to become fully operational.
 
Providing Information About Natural Capital
Measure
Estimated Cost
Implementing Agency
Purpose and Benefits of Measure
1. Develop and regularly report six indicators of natural and human capital $5 million per year to improve and report the indicators on an annual basis Statistics Canada, Environment Canada, Natural Resources Canada Provide tracking of some of Canada’s key types of natural and human capital to enable informed decision making
2. Begin to expand the System of National Accounts to include all types of natural, human and, eventually, social capital $20 million per year to expand and maintain new capital accounts Statistics Canada Enable comprehensive assessment of Canada’s key types of capital. Allow for better analysis of issues that have both environmental and economic aspects
3. Begin to make fully operational Environment Canada’s Canadian Information System for the Environment (CISE) $20 million per year to fund CISE Environment Canada Expand the collection, management, assessment, and communication of environmental knowledge at a national level through the creation of a publicly accessible information system; includes creating cohesive, national databases on natural capital such as water quality

Next set of recommendations
Helping Rural and Aboriginal Communities
Protect Natural Capital


National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy
2004 Greening of the Budget Submission
Complete document -- Adobe PDF version
Investing in Canada's Natural Capital
[Summary] - [Details and Table of Recommended Measures]
Improving the Information Based on Natural Capital
[Summary] - [Details and Table of Recommended Measures]
Helping Rural and Aboriginal Communities
Protect Natural Capital

[Summary] - [Details and Table of Recommended Measures]
Protecting Natural Capital in Urban Communities
[Summary] - [Details and Table of Recommended Measures]