Skip to the Site Index
Skip to Page Content
Environment Canada signature Canada Wordmark
Skip first menu
  Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New
About Us
Topics Publications Weather Home
National Office of Pollution Prevention
Table of Contents
Abstract
Summary
1. Introduction
2. Monitoring/Direct Measurement of Releases
3. Analytical Methods
4. Quality Assurance/Quality Control
5. Estimation of Releases
6. Reporting
7. Validation / Verification
Glossary of Terms and Acronyms
References
Bibliography
Appendix A: Standardized Release Reporting Template
Appendix B: Error Estimation
Appendix C: US EPA AP-42 Emission Factors
GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR REPORTING OF RELEASES FROM THE BASE METALS SMELTING SECTOR

| TOC | Previous | Next |

Summary

Various substances, which are relevant to the Base Metals Smelting Sector (BMSS), have been declared toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA). A multi-stakeholder Strategic Options Process (SOP) was launched in May 1996 to address the management of these substances. The SOP culminated in the development of a Strategic Option Report (SOR) in June 1997. The Minister of Environment accepted the report in April 1999.

The SOR outlines environmental concerns associated with the BMSS and advances recommendations aimed at preserving and enhancing the quality of the environment that is affected by these BMSS complexes. Many of the recommendations of the SOR including Recommendation # 1, "Release Reduction Targets and Schedules" require reliable, verifiable data. One step in ensuring reliable, verifiable and consistently reported data is the development of a Guidance Document for Reporting of Releases. Subsequently, Environment Canada contracted Hatch Associates Ltd. to, among other activities, to prepare this Guidance Document.

The SOR focused on inorganic arsenic compounds, inorganic cadmium compounds, lead, mercury and oxidic, sulphidic and soluble inorganic nickel compounds which were CEPA 1988 toxics at that time. While the SOR focused on the CEPA-toxics listed above, this report also includes guidance related to particulate matter and sulphur dioxide. In addition, other parameters such as dioxins and furans and greenhouse gases are also included in this document.

A review of existing guidance documents, standards and methods was conducted to identify methods and practices that are applicable to the Base Metals Smelting Sector. Aspects of reporting of releases that are addressed in this guidance document include:

  • Sampling/Monitoring - this section describes when monitoring is appropriate, what parameters should be monitored at the time of sampling, where they should be monitored and a suggested frequency of monitoring for both air and water releases. It also describes Standard Reference Methods that can be applied to the monitoring.

  • Analytical Methods - this section describes parameters to be analyzed and appropriate analytical methods for analyzing the samples collected. A discussion on the appropriate detection limits and laboratory certification is provided. Applicable Standard Reference Methods are also identified.

  • Quality Assurance And Quality Control - the Quality Assurance/Quality Control section describes quality assurance and quality control procedures for sampling and analysis.

  • Calculation/Estimation Of Releases - this section provides guidance on the estimation of releases from the Base Metals Smelting Sector. Various methods of estimation are described and examples provided for calculations using monitoring data, mass balance, emission factors or engineering calculations. Sources of additional information on estimating releases are also provided.

  • Reporting - this section focuses on reporting in response to a request for data from Environment Canada. A Standardized Release Reporting Template is found in Appendix A. The information on monitoring, analysis, quality assurance/quality control and release estimation provided in this Guidance Document can also be used to calculate releases for reporting to existing federal or provincial programs or for internal company use.

  • Validation/Verification - this section provides guidance on external validation and verification of the data reported to various environmental agencies. It provides some background on requirements for third party verification and some existing practices in the Canadian Base Metals Smelting Sector.

The following table summarizes the series of recommendations developed by Hatch as a result of the review. These recommendations are intended to assist industry in providing reliable, verifiable and consistently reported data.

Table S-1-1: Summary of Recommendations

Number

Subject

Summary of Recommendations

Monitoring

RN101

Monitoring Program Design

Monitoring programs should be designed to be representative of the parameters being considered.

RN102

Air Monitoring Frequency

Stack testing or monitoring should be conducted as required by regulation or permit.  Where requirements are not specified, major sources at a facility should be monitored once per year.  The “major sources” should account for over 75% of the releases from the facility.

RN103

Dioxins and Furans

Each facility should sample its major sources of emissions to determine whether dioxins and furans are present in the releases.

RN104

Methodology

Standard reference methods should be used for stack sampling/testing.

RN105

Air Monitoring Parameters

The following off-gas parameters should be measured:  volumetric flow rate, temperature, water vapour content, static pressure in the off-gas duct, and atmospheric pressure.

RN106

Continuous Emissions Monitoring

Where a CEM system is considered, it should be designed and operated following the recommendations of the document titled Protocols and Performance Specification for Continuous Monitoring of Gaseous Emissions from Thermal Power Generation - Report EPS 1/PG/71 published by Environment Canada in September 1993, or as modified.

RN107

Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

An ambient air quality monitoring program should be developed and implemented in consultation with the appropriate regulatory authorities.  This program should include monitoring of metals, particulate matter (total, PM10 and PM2.5) and sulphur dioxide taking into account:

  • the location of the emission sources under the control of the facility operator; and

  • local meteorological conditions and probable maximum deposition areas.

RN108

Wastewater Sampling Points

Water discharge should be sampled at the final discharge point for the purposes of calculating releases.  Releases from each final discharge point should be sampled.

RN109

Wastewater Monitoring Frequency

Water discharge sampling should be conducted as required by regulation or permit. Where requirements are not specified, final discharge points at a facility should be monitored monthly.

RN110

Methodology

Standard methods should be used for wastewater sampling/testing. A key reference document for sampling methods is Environment Canada's Guidance Document for the Sampling and Analysis of Metal Mining Effluents.

RN111

Wastewater Monitoring Parameters

The following effluent parameters should be measured:  volumetric flow rate, temperature. Key reference documents are Environment Canada's Guidance Document for the Sampling and Analysis of Metal Mining Effluents and Guidance Document for Flow Measurement of Metal Mining Effluents.

Analytical Methods

RN201

Air Samples Analysis Parameters

Air samples should be analyzed as required by regulations or permits.  Where requirements are not specified, samples from air monitoring should be analyzed for the CEPA-toxic metals, particulate matter (PM, PM10 and PM2.5) as well as sulphur dioxide.  A full metals scan should be conducted.

RN202

Wastewater Samples Analysis  Parameters

Water samples should be analyzed as required by regulations or permits.  Where requirements are not specified, samples should be analyzed for all metals and total suspended solids as well as pH.  Samples should also be analyzed for other parameters that can be used to characterize the discharge (e.g., fluoride, chloride, magnesium, calcium).

RN203

Parameters not expected to be present in releases

When it is believed that a particular parameter is not present in the releases based on technical knowledge and experience of the facility, analysis for this parameter should be periodically undertaken, but is not necessary on every sample. 

Documentation should be maintained to validate that the parameter is not present in the releases including reasons the parameter is unlikely to be released.

When significant changes to process inputs or processes have occurred, analysis for all parameters should be conducted.

RN204

Analytical Methods

The selection of analytical methods should be appropriate to meet the data quality objectives.  Methods selected should be generally accepted and in common use in laboratories in Canada.

RN205

Laboratory Accreditation

All environmental samples should be analyzed by a Standards Council of Canada/Canadian Association for Environmental Analytical Laboratories (SCC/CAEAL) accredited laboratory.

RN206

Laboratory Method Detection Limit

The laboratory method detection limit (LMDL) should be limits specified in Environment Canada's Guidance Document for the Sampling and Analysis of Metal Mining Effluents or 2 to 10 times lower than the government-regulated discharge limits for the facility, where requirements are not specified.

Quality Assurance/Quality Control

RN301

Quality Assurance/Quality Control Programs

QA/QC programs should exist for both the field sampling procedures (collection, preservation, filtration and shipping components) and analytical procedures (laboratory component).

Calculation/Estimation Of Releases

RN401

Sources to be Included

Release estimates should include all known discharges to the environment including routine and non-routine (e.g., significant operating excursions and/or accidental spills) discharges.

RN402

Calculation Methodology

Releases should be estimated using one of the techniques as described in Environment Canada's National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) guidance document:

  • monitoring or direct measurement (Code M);

  • mass balance (Code C);

  • emission factors (Code E); and

  • engineering estimates (Code O).

Reporting

RN501

Reporting Entity

Releases should be reported by facility as opposed to company-wide totals.

RN502

Total Release Data

The total releases from the site should be reported including all releases.  Air emission data should include stack and fugitive releases.

RN503

Release Point Data

Information should be provided for each major release point including:

  • Total release from the release point

  • Method of estimating releases

  • Error Estimation - absolute, percent or degree (high to low)

  • Concentration (average and maximum)

RN504

Reporting Units

Releases of particulate matter, sulphur dioxide, arsenic, cadmium, lead and nickel should be reported in tonnes. 

Mercury releases should be reported in kilograms (kg).

Dioxins and furans should be reported in grams Toxic Equivalents (g TEQ)

RN505

Concentration Units

Concentration in stack samples should be reported as milligrams per Normal cubic metre (mg/Nm3)

Concentration in effluent samples should be reported as milligrams per litre (mg/L)

RN506

Low Level Data Nomenclature

The following notations should be used for low level releases:

  • <LMDL (less than the method detection limit) means that the facility has tested for a parameter and all results are lower than the analytical method detection limit;

  • n.m/e (not measured or estimated) means that the facility has not tested for or estimated the amount of pollutant; or

  • not significant indicates that the facility has not tested for a parameter but believes that the quantity of the parameter released is not significant.

Validation/Verification

RN601

Identification of Verified Data

Facilities should identify data that has been validated by an external third party in their reporting documents.

RN602

Verification Frequency

Release data should be subject to an external audit at least every three years, where more frequent verification is not a regulatory requirement.  However, when significant changes to process inputs, processes or calculation methodology have occurred, the subsequent calculations should be subject to external verification.

Top of Page


1 Environment Canada Protocols and Performance Specification for Continuous Monitoring of Gaseous Emissions from Thermal Power Generation - Report EPS 1/PG/7, September 1993.

Top of Page


| What's New | About Us | Topics | Publications | Weather | Home |
| Help | Search | Canada Site |
The Green LaneTM, Environment Canada's World Wide Web site
Important Notices