Various substances, which are relevant to the Base Metals Smelting Sector
(BMSS), have been declared toxic under the Canadian Environmental
Protection Act (CEPA). A multi-stakeholder Strategic Options
Process (SOP) was launched in May 1996 to address the management of these
substances. The SOP culminated in the development of a Strategic Option
Report (SOR) in June 1997. The Minister of Environment accepted the report
in April 1999.
The SOR outlines environmental concerns associated with the BMSS and
advances recommendations aimed at preserving and enhancing the quality
of the environment that is affected by these BMSS complexes. Many of
the recommendations of the SOR including Recommendation # 1, "Release
Reduction Targets and Schedules" require reliable, verifiable data.
One step in ensuring reliable, verifiable and consistently reported data
is the development of a Guidance Document for Reporting of Releases.
Subsequently, Environment Canada contracted Hatch Associates Ltd. to,
among other activities, to prepare this Guidance Document.
The SOR focused on inorganic arsenic compounds, inorganic cadmium compounds,
lead, mercury and oxidic, sulphidic and soluble inorganic nickel compounds
which were CEPA 1988 toxics at that time. While the SOR focused on the CEPA-toxics
listed above, this report also includes guidance related to particulate
matter and sulphur dioxide. In addition, other parameters such as dioxins
and furans and greenhouse gases are also included in this document.
A review of existing guidance documents, standards and methods was conducted
to identify methods and practices that are applicable to the Base Metals
Smelting Sector. Aspects of reporting of releases that are addressed
in this guidance document include:
The following table summarizes the series of recommendations developed
by Hatch as a result of the review. These recommendations are intended
to assist industry in providing reliable, verifiable and consistently
reported data.
Table S-1-1: Summary of Recommendations
Number |
Subject |
Summary of Recommendations |
Monitoring |
RN101 |
Monitoring Program Design |
Monitoring programs should be designed
to be representative of the parameters being considered. |
RN102 |
Air Monitoring Frequency |
Stack testing or monitoring should
be conducted as required by regulation or permit. Where requirements
are not specified, major sources at a facility should be monitored
once per year. The “major sources” should account
for over 75% of the releases from the facility. |
RN103 |
Dioxins and Furans |
Each facility should sample its major
sources of emissions to determine whether dioxins and furans are
present in the releases. |
RN104 |
Methodology |
Standard reference methods should be
used for stack sampling/testing. |
RN105 |
Air Monitoring Parameters |
The following off-gas parameters should
be measured: volumetric flow rate, temperature, water vapour
content, static pressure in the off-gas duct, and atmospheric pressure. |
RN106 |
Continuous Emissions Monitoring |
Where a CEM system is considered, it
should be designed and operated following the recommendations of
the document titled Protocols and Performance Specification
for Continuous Monitoring of Gaseous Emissions from Thermal Power
Generation - Report EPS 1/PG/71 published
by Environment Canada in September 1993, or as modified. |
RN107 |
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring |
An ambient air quality monitoring program
should be developed and implemented in consultation with the appropriate
regulatory authorities. This program should include monitoring
of metals, particulate matter (total, PM10 and PM2.5) and sulphur
dioxide taking into account:
- the location of the emission sources under the control of
the facility operator; and
- local meteorological conditions and probable maximum deposition
areas.
|
RN108 |
Wastewater Sampling Points |
Water discharge should be sampled at
the final discharge point for the purposes of calculating releases. Releases
from each final discharge point should be sampled. |
RN109 |
Wastewater Monitoring
Frequency |
Water discharge sampling should be
conducted as required by regulation or permit. Where requirements
are not specified, final discharge points at a facility should
be monitored monthly. |
RN110 |
Methodology |
Standard methods should be used for
wastewater sampling/testing. A key reference document for sampling
methods is Environment Canada's Guidance Document for the
Sampling and Analysis of Metal Mining Effluents. |
RN111 |
Wastewater Monitoring
Parameters |
The following effluent parameters should
be measured: volumetric flow rate, temperature. Key reference
documents are Environment Canada's Guidance Document for
the Sampling and Analysis of Metal Mining Effluents and Guidance
Document for Flow Measurement of Metal Mining Effluents. |
Analytical
Methods |
RN201 |
Air Samples Analysis Parameters |
Air samples should be analyzed as required
by regulations or permits. Where requirements are not specified,
samples from air monitoring should be analyzed for the CEPA-toxic
metals, particulate matter (PM, PM10 and PM2.5) as well as sulphur
dioxide. A full metals scan should be conducted. |
RN202 |
Wastewater Samples Analysis Parameters |
Water samples should be analyzed as
required by regulations or permits. Where requirements are
not specified, samples should be analyzed for all metals and total
suspended solids as well as pH. Samples should also be analyzed
for other parameters that can be used to characterize the discharge
(e.g., fluoride, chloride, magnesium, calcium). |
RN203 |
Parameters not expected to be present
in releases |
When it is believed that a particular
parameter is not present in the releases based on technical knowledge
and experience of the facility, analysis for this parameter should
be periodically undertaken, but is not necessary on every sample.
Documentation should be maintained to validate that the parameter
is not present in the releases including reasons the parameter
is unlikely to be released.
When significant changes to process inputs or processes have occurred,
analysis for all parameters should be conducted. |
RN204 |
Analytical Methods |
The selection of analytical methods
should be appropriate to meet the data quality objectives. Methods
selected should be generally accepted and in common use in laboratories
in Canada. |
RN205 |
Laboratory Accreditation |
All environmental samples should be
analyzed by a Standards Council of Canada/Canadian Association
for Environmental Analytical Laboratories (SCC/CAEAL) accredited
laboratory. |
RN206 |
Laboratory Method Detection Limit |
The laboratory method detection limit
(LMDL) should be limits specified in Environment Canada's
Guidance Document for the Sampling and Analysis of Metal Mining
Effluents or 2 to 10 times lower than the government-regulated
discharge limits for the facility, where requirements are not specified. |
Quality
Assurance/Quality Control |
RN301 |
Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Programs |
QA/QC programs should exist for both
the field sampling procedures (collection, preservation, filtration
and shipping components) and analytical procedures (laboratory
component). |
Calculation/Estimation
Of Releases |
RN401 |
Sources to be Included |
Release estimates should include all
known discharges to the environment including routine and non-routine
(e.g., significant operating excursions and/or accidental spills)
discharges. |
RN402 |
Calculation Methodology |
Releases should be estimated using
one of the techniques as described in Environment Canada's
National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) guidance document:
- monitoring or direct measurement (Code M);
- mass balance (Code C);
- emission factors (Code E); and
- engineering estimates (Code O).
|
Reporting |
RN501 |
Reporting Entity |
Releases should be reported by facility
as opposed to company-wide totals. |
RN502 |
Total Release Data |
The total releases from the site should
be reported including all releases. Air emission data should
include stack and fugitive releases. |
RN503 |
Release Point Data |
Information should be provided for
each major release point including:
- Total release from the release point
- Method of estimating releases
- Error Estimation - absolute, percent or degree (high to low)
- Concentration (average and maximum)
|
RN504 |
Reporting Units |
Releases of particulate matter, sulphur
dioxide, arsenic, cadmium, lead and nickel should be reported in
tonnes.
Mercury releases should be reported in kilograms (kg).
Dioxins and furans should be reported in grams Toxic Equivalents
(g TEQ) |
RN505 |
Concentration Units |
Concentration in stack samples should
be reported as milligrams per Normal cubic metre (mg/Nm3)
Concentration in effluent samples should be reported as milligrams
per litre (mg/L) |
RN506 |
Low Level Data Nomenclature |
The following notations should be used
for low level releases:
- <LMDL (less than the method detection limit)
means that the facility has tested for a parameter and all
results are lower than the analytical method detection limit;
- n.m/e (not measured or estimated) means that the
facility has not tested for or estimated the amount of pollutant;
or
- not significant indicates that the facility has
not tested for a parameter but believes that the quantity of
the parameter released is not significant.
|
Validation/Verification |
RN601 |
Identification of Verified Data |
Facilities should identify data that
has been validated by an external third party in their reporting
documents. |
RN602 |
Verification Frequency |
Release data should be subject to an
external audit at least every three years, where more frequent
verification is not a regulatory requirement. However, when
significant changes to process inputs, processes or calculation
methodology have occurred, the subsequent calculations should be
subject to external verification. |